Gatton, Applicant; Limerick Steamship Company, Respondents

Core Citations

REFERS TO

• Marshall v Wild Rose (Owners of SS.)
• McDonald v Owners of SS. Banana
• Pomfret v Lancashire and Yorkshire Railway Company

CONSIDERS

• Bender v "Zent" (Owners of S.S.)
• Grant v Glasgow and South-Western Railway Company

CITES

• Smith v Lancashire and Yorkshire Railway Company
• Reed v Great Western Railway Company
• Jackson v General Steam Fishing Company Ltd

[See more]

• Davey v London and South Western Railway Company
• Radcliffe v Pacific Steam Navigation Company

CITED in

• Hetherington v Dublin and Blessington Steam Tramway Company
• ROURKE, APPLICANT v HOLT & Company

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1910] 2 IR 561

This document cites

• Marshall v Wild Rose (Owners of SS.)
• Davey v London and South Western Railway Company
• Pomfret v Lancashire and Yorkshire Railway Company
• Smith v Lancashire and Yorkshire Railway Company
• Davey v London and South Western Railway Company



See all quotations

• Marshall v Wild Rose (Owners of SS.)
• Low v General Steam Fishing Company
• Bender v "Zent" (Owners of S.S.)
• McDonald v Owners of SS. Banana
• Reed v Great Western Railway Company
• Eyre v Houghton Main Colliery Company
• Radcliffe v Pacific Steam Navigation Company
• Jackson v General Steam Fishing Company Ltd
• Grant v Glasgow and South-Western Railway Company
• Workmen's Compensation Act 1906
• Workmen's Compensation Act 1897