A-G for the Straits Settlements v Pang Ah Yew

Core Citations

REFERS TO

• Viscount Canterbury v R
• Connecticut Fire Insurance Company v Kavanagh
• Dixon v Farrer

[See more]

• Goff against The Great northern Railway Company
• Lane against Sir Robert Cotton
• Lane v Sir Robert Cotton and Sir Thomas Frankland
• Macdougall v Knight
• Davies v Salter
• Ricket against The Metropolitian Railway company

FOLLOWS

• Bolingbroke v Swindon Local Board
• North Staffordshire Railway Company v Edge
• Raleigh v Goschen

[See more]

• Attorney General of the Straits Settlement v Wemyss
• Bainbridge v Postmaster-General
• Banbury v Bank of Montreal
• Barwick v English Joint Stock Bank
• Bayley v Manchester, Sheffield, and Lincolnshire Railway Company
• Lord Bellamont's Case
• Biscoe v Great Eastern Railway Company
• Connectiout Fire Insurance v Cavenegh
• Dixon v Farrer
• Farnell v Bowman
• Freeman against Rosher
• Garden Gully United Quartz Mining Company v McLister
• Gauntlett v King and Another
• Graham v Public Works Commissioners
• Haseler v Lemoyne and Another
• Joseph Rand Ltd v Craig
• Lane v Cotton et Al
• Money and Others v Leach
• North Staffordshire Railway Company v Edge
• Ormiston v Great Western Railway Company
• Hutton v The London and South-Western Railway Company
• Ricket v Metropolitan Railway Company
• Thomas Eales Rogers v Rajendro Dutt
• Roper v Public Works Commissioners
• Smith v Keal
• Sutton against Johnstone
• The Tasmania
• Whitfield v Lord le Despencer et Al
• Wilson v United Counties Bank Ltd
• Banbury v Bank of Montreal

REFERRED in

• Leftenan-Kolonel Harbajan Singh Jagat Singh v Azmi Abdul Rahman
• Hup Seng Perusahaan Makanan (M) Sdn Bhd v Lam Soon Edible Oils Sdn Bhd and Another
• Azmi bin Abdul Rahman; Leftenan-Kolonel Harbajan Singh a/l Jagat Singh and Others

[See more]

• Kerajaan Malaysia v Beyond Gateway Sdn Bhd
• Pengusaha, Tempat Tahanan Perlindungan Kamunting, Taiping & 2 Ors v Badrul Zaman bin PS Md Zakariah

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1934] MLJ 184

FOLLOWED in

• Lim Geak Liang v East West UMI Insurance Bhd

DISTINGUISHED in

• United Malay States Sugar Industries Ltd; Yong Mok Hin

This document cites

• Smith v Keal
• Connectiout Fire Insurance v Cavenegh
• Lord Bellamont's Case
• Roper v Public Works Commissioners
• Bayley v Manchester, Sheffield, and Lincolnshire Railway Company



See all quotations

• Raleigh v Goschen
• Banbury v Bank of Montreal
• Lane v Sir Robert Cotton and Sir Thomas Frankland
• North Staffordshire Railway Company v Edge
• Dixon v Farrer
• Wilson v United Counties Bank Ltd
• Money and Others v Leach
• Sutton against Johnstone
• Biscoe v Great Eastern Railway Company
• Freeman against Rosher
• The Tasmania
• Barwick v English Joint Stock Bank
• Graham v Public Works Commissioners
• Macdougall v Knight
• Lane v Cotton et Al
• Lane against Sir Robert Cotton
• Bainbridge v Postmaster-General
• Dixon v Farrer
• Viscount Canterbury v R
• Hutton v The London and South-Western Railway Company
• Ricket v Metropolitan Railway Company
• Whitfield v Lord le Despencer et Al
• Davies v Salter
• Joseph Rand Ltd v Craig
• Goff against The Great northern Railway Company
• Gauntlett v King and Another
• Haseler v Lemoyne and Another
• Bolingbroke v Swindon Local Board
• Ormiston v Great Western Railway Company
• North Staffordshire Railway Company v Edge