Friedman v. Roels

Core Citations

DISAVOWS

• Goodman v. Forsen

DISAGREED in

• In re O'Connor

This document cites

• Federal Cases - Troxel et vir. v Granville
• Colorado - In the Matter of Minor Child D.I.S.Alan Sidman v. Sidman
• Arizona - Pima County by City of Tucson v. Maya Const. Co., CV-87-0001-PR
• Arizona - Fought v. Fought
• Maryland - McDermott v. Dougherty



See all quotations

• Arizona - McGovern v. McGovern
• Arizona - Downs v. Scheffler
• Arizona - Brenda D. v. Dep't of Child Safety
• Oregon Caselaw - Harrington v. Daum
• Federal Cases - Santosky v. Kramer
• Arizona - Ward v. Ward
• Arizona - Jackson v. Tangreen
• Arizona - Andro v. Andro
• Arizona - City of Phoenix v. Geyler, 17615-PR
• Arizona - Goodman v. Forsen
• Arizona - Chapman v. Hopkins
• Arizona - Graville v. Dodge
• Arizona - Johnson v. Johnson, 15298-PR
• US - Reference Stubs - Judicial supervision
• US - Reference Stubs - Definitions
• US - Reference Stubs - Attorney fees
• US - Reference Stubs - Parents' rights protected
• US - Reference Stubs - Rehearing review by supreme court; issuance of mandate
• US - Reference Stubs - Parents' bill of rights; governmental interference restricted; burden of proof; definition
• US - Reference Stubs - Jurisdiction
• US - Reference Stubs - A.R.S. § 25-409 Third Party Rights