Frank Otuo v Watchtower Bible and Tract Society of Britain

Core Citations

REFERS TO

• Marren v Dawson Bentley & Company Ltd
• The Queen (on the Application of Nicholas) v Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber) Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (Interested Party)
• Taylor and Another v Lawrence and Another

[See more]

• Reed Elsevier UK Ltd (T/A LexisNexis) and Another v Raymond Russell Bewry (Respondent/Claimant)
• Gentoo Group Ltd and Another v Hanratty
• Re Uddin (A Child) (serious injury: standard of proof)

FOLLOWS

• Pritam Kaur v S. Russell & Sons Ltd

CITES

• Hartley v Birmingham City District Council
• Re Glatt
• Steedman and Others v British Broadcasting Corporation

CONSIDERS

• Limitation Act 1939 - Articles : S-2
• Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1934
• Limitation Act 1980 - Articles : S-32A

[See more]

• Limitation Act 1980 - Articles : S-4A
• Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1934
• Defamation Act 2013 - Articles : S-1

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [2017] EMLR 15

REFERRED in

• Frank Kofi Otuo v Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society of Britain

This document cites

• Gentoo Group Ltd and Another v Hanratty
• Re Uddin (A Child) (serious injury: standard of proof)
• Taylor and Another v Lawrence and Another
• Steedman and Others v British Broadcasting Corporation
• Hartley v Birmingham City District Council



See all quotations

• Reed Elsevier UK Ltd (T/A LexisNexis) and Another v Raymond Russell Bewry (Respondent/Claimant)
• The Queen (on the Application of Nicholas) v Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber) Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (Interested Party)
• Re Glatt
• Pritam Kaur v S. Russell & Sons Ltd
• Marren v Dawson Bentley & Company Ltd
• Defamation Act 2013
• Limitation Act 1939
• Limitation Act 1980
• Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1934