Fowley Marine (Emsworth) Ltd v Gafford

Core Citations

---

REFERS TO

• Perry v Clissold
• Attorney General v Parmeter and Others Re Portsmouth Harbour
• Asher and Wife v Whitlock

[See more]

• Attorney-General v Wright
• Wuta-Ofei v Danquah

RESUELVE RECURSO

• Fowley Marine (Emsworth) Ltd v Gafford

REVERSES

• Fowley Marine (Emsworth) Ltd v Gafford

CONSIDERS

• Lord Advocate v Young; North London Railway Company v Young
• Beaufort (Duke) v Aird
• Limitation Act 1939 - Articles : S-4

[See more]

• Taxes Management Act 1880
• Companies Act 1900 - Articles : S-26

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1968] 1 All ER 979
• [1968] 1 Lloyd's Rep 343
• [1968] 2 WLR 842

[See more]

• [1968] 2 QB 618

DISTINGUISHED in

• Attorney-General v Wright [1987 H No 3600]

CONSIDERED in

• Ipswich Borough Council (Plaintiff) v Derek Moore
• Lesley Irene Simpson (Claimant/Appellant) v Roger Fergus and Another
• Kelsick v Durand

[See more]

• Wills Kelsick Claimant v Kenny Durand Defendant [ECSC]
• Roberts v Crown Estate Commissioners

FOLLOWED in

• Hong Hin Tin Mining Co; Wong See Kui

REFERRED in

• St. Helier (Parish) v Manning

CITED in

• The Port of London Authority v Tower Bridge Yacht & Boat Company Ltd

This document cites

---

• Attorney General v Parmeter and Others Re Portsmouth Harbour
• Attorney-General v Wright
• Wuta-Ofei v Danquah
• Perry v Clissold
• Asher and Wife v Whitlock



See all quotations

• Lord Advocate v Young; North London Railway Company v Young
• Fowley Marine (Emsworth) Ltd v Gafford
• Beaufort (Duke) v Aird
• Companies Act 1900
• Taxes Management Act 1880