Forward Food Management Pte Ltd and Another v Public Prosecutor

Core Citations

REFERS TO

• Choy Tuck Sum v Public Prosecutor
• Public Prosecutor v Tsao Kok Wah
• R v Harris, Balls, and Moses

[See more]

• Smith v Hughes
• Sweet v Parsley
• Teng Lang Khin v Public Prosecutor
• Tuck & Sons v Priester
• Yeo Choon Huat v Public Prosecutor
• Deming No 456 Pty Ltd v Brisbane Unit Development Corporation Pty Ltd
• Attorney-General's Reference (No. 1 of 1989)

FOLLOWS

• Black-Clawson International Ltd v Papierwerke Waldhof-Aschaffenburg A.G.
• Bowers v Gloucester Corporation
• Scott v Cawsey

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [2002] SGHC 46
• [2002] 2 SLR 40

REFERRED in

• Chee Soon Juan v PP
• PP v Phuthita Somchit
• PP v Ng Guan Hup

FOLLOWED in

• Public Prosecutor v Lew Syn Pau and Another
• Public Prosecutor v Low Kok Heng
• Comfort Management Pte Ltd v Public Prosecutor

This document cites

• R. v. Hasselwander, (1993) 152 N.R. 247 (SCC)
• R. v. Paré, (1987) 80 N.R. 272 (SCC)
• R. v. Green, (1992) 132 N.R. 234 (SCC)
• R v Ottewell
• Black-Clawson International Ltd v Papierwerke Waldhof-Aschaffenburg A.G.



See all quotations

• Attorney-General's Reference (No. 1 of 1989)
• Sweet v Parsley
• R v Harris, Balls, and Moses
• Smith v Hughes
• Bowers v Gloucester Corporation
• Lim Chin Aik v The Queen
• Re Sim Khoon Seng's Application
• Scott v Cawsey
• Beckwith v R
• Deming No 456 Pty Ltd v Brisbane Unit Development Corporation Pty Ltd
• R v Adams
• Tuck & Sons v Priester
• Tuck v Priester
• Bowers v Gloucester Corporation
• Choy Tuck Sum v Public Prosecutor
• Yeo Choon Huat v Public Prosecutor
• Public Prosecutor v Tsao Kok Wah
• Teng Lang Khin v Public Prosecutor
• Interpretation Act 1965
• Evidence Act 1893