ACTA fool or: how rights holders learned to stop worrying and love 512's subpoena provisions.
›
Linked as:Summary
No longer available (Autolink)
See the full content of this document
Extract
ACTA fool or: how rights holders learned to stop worrying and love 512's subpoena provisions.
No longer available (Autolink)
See the full content of this document
This document cites
- Federal Cases - 393 F.3d 771 (8th Cir. 2005), 03-3802, In re Charter Communications, Inc. Subpoena Enforcement Matter
- Federal Cases - 239 F.3d 1004 (9th Cir. 2001), 00-16401, A&M Records v. Napster
- Federal Cases - 367 F.Supp.2d 945 (M.D.N.C. 2005), 1 03MC138, In re Subpoena to University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
- Federal Cases - 494 F.Supp.2d 388 (E.D.Va. 2007), C. A. 4 07cv52, Interscope Records v. Does 1-7
- Federal Cases - 572 F.Supp.2d 1150 (N.D.Cal. 2008), C 07-3783, Lenz v. Universal Music Corp.
