Focken v Fraser Health Authority,

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• Supply and Appropriation (Anticipation and Adjustments) Act 2021

CONSIDERS

• England Securities Ltd v Ulmer,
• Vatarescu v the Commonwealth of Australia for the Agency of Centrelink (No 2)

CONSIDERED in

• Armstrong v Kotanko,
• SCP 173 Realty Ltd v Costa Del Sol Holdings Ltd,
• Ashraf v Jazz Aviation LP,

[See more]

• VM Agritech Ltd v Smith,
• Brazinski v Brazinski,

This document cites

• Brule v. Rutledge et al., 2014 BCCA 197
• Clements v. Clements, (2012) 431 N.R. 198 (SCC)
• Ediger v. Johnston et al., (2013) 442 N.R. 105 (SCC)
• N.V. Bocimar S.A. v. Century Insurance Co. of Canada, (1987) 76 N.R. 212 (SCC)
• Lapointe v. Chevrette, (1992) 133 N.R. 116 (SCC)



See all quotations

• WHA 820 Holdings v. Daymax Mgt., 2004 BCCA 414
• Creative Salmon Co. v. Staniford, 2007 BCCA 285
• Neuzen v. Korn, (1995) 188 N.R. 161 (SCC)
• Housen v. Nikolaisen et al., 2002 SCC 33
• Freshway Specialty Foods Inc. v. Map Produce LLC et al., (2006) 247 B.C.A.C. 93 (CA)
• South Yukon Forest Corp. et al. v. Canada, (2012) 431 N.R. 286 (FCA)
• Soleil Hospitality Inc. v. Louie et al., 2011 BCCA 305
• Holsten v. Card et al., (2002) 162 B.C.A.C. 276 (CA)
• St-Jean v. Mercier, 2002 SCC 15
• Toneguzzo-Norvell et al. v. Savein and Burnaby Hospital, (1994) 162 N.R. 161 (SCC)
• Nelson (City) v. Mowatt, 2017 SCC 8
• Din v. Fraser Health Authority, 2022 BCCA 108
• Focken v. Fraser Health Authority, 2022 BCSC 2124
• England Securities Ltd. v. Ulmer,
• Focken v. Fraser Health Authority,