Fitch Lovell Ltd v Commissioners of Inland Revenue
Linked as:
Extract
Fitch Lovell Ltd v Commissioners of Inland Revenue
No longer available (Autolink)
See the full content of this document
Core Citations
CONSIDERS
- Stamp Act 1891 - Articles : S-58
- Stamp Act 1891 - Articles : SCH-1
DISTINGUISHES
REFERS TO
- Re Rose. Rose v Commissioners of Inland Revenue
- White v Bristol Aeroplane Company Ltd
- Escoigne Properties Ltd v Commissioners of Inland Revenue
[See more]
APPLIES
- Chesterfield Brewery Company v Commissioners of Inland Revenue
- Fleetwood-Hesketh v Commissioners of Inland Revenue
- John Smith's Tadcaster Brewery Company Ltd v Gresham Life Assurance Society. Re Smith's (John) Tadcaster Brewery
[See more]
REFERRED in
- Perpetual Trustee Company (Canberra) Ltd v Commissioner for Australian Capital Territory Revenue
- Boyle v Accountant General 1996 Appellate Jur. No. 2
- Edward Simons and Hill Top Corporation v Accountant General 1997 Civil Jur. No. 270
CITED in
- WM Cory & Son Ltd v Commissioners of Inland Revenue
- WM Cory & Son Ltd v Commissioners of Inland Revenue
CONSIDERED in
- Sun Alliance Insurance Ltd v Commissioners of Inland Revenue
- Rio Tinto Ltd v Commissioner of State Revenue (in His Capacity as Comptroller of Stamps)
- Unilever (UK) Holdings Ltd v Smith (Inspector of Taxes)
[See more]
REPORTED OPINION OF in
APPLIED in
