Finch and another v Richardson

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• Re Piers. ex parte Piers
• Hicks v British Transport Commission

FOLLOWS

• McCrory v Hendron
• Ex parte Walker

REFERS TO

• Kyd, ex p
• Nichol v Fearby; Nichol v Robinson

DOES NOT FOLLOW

• Smith and Sloan v Mackenzie
• Hateley v James

CONSIDERS

• Representation of the People Act 1983 - Articles : S-86
• Representation of the People Act 1983 - Articles : S-90C
• Representation of the People Act 1983 - Articles : S-167

[See more]

• Representation of the People Act 1983
• Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act 2000 - Articles : S-134
• Corrupt and Illegal Practices Prevention Act 1883
• Bankruptcy Act 1883

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• 12/12/2008 Daily Cases
• [2009] 1 WLR 1338
• [2009] PTSR 841

CONSIDERED in

• Merck KGAA v Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC (formerly Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation)

REFERRED in

• Merck KGAA v Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC (formerly Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation)

This document cites

• Hicks v British Transport Commission
• Re Piers. ex parte Piers
• Smith and Sloan v Mackenzie
• Ex parte Walker
• McCrory v Hendron



See all quotations

• Nichol v Fearby; Nichol v Robinson
• Kyd, ex p
• Hateley v James
• Representation of the People Act 1983
• Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act 2000
• Bankruptcy Act 1883
• Corrupt and Illegal Practices Prevention Act 1883
• The Representation of the People (Variation of Limits of Candidates' Election Expenses) (City of London) Order 2005