FINANCIAL REGULATION--The Ancient Doctrine of Champerty and a First for the New York Court of Appeals.

This document cites

• Federal Cases - 504 U.S. 555 (1992), 90-1424, Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife
• Federal Cases - 422 U.S. 490 (1975), 73-2024, Warth v. Seldin
• Illinois - 818 N.E.2d 888 (Ill.App. 2 Dist. 2004), 2-03-0548, People v. Waldrop
• Massachusetts - 426 Mass. 231 (1997), Saladini v. Righellis
• Minnesota - 682 N.W.2d 671 (Minn.Ct.App. 2004), A03-1511, Johnson v. Wright



See all quotations

• New York - 113 A.D. 24, Wightman v. Catlin
• New York - 128 A.D.3d 553, 2015-04381, Justinian Capital SPC v. WestLB AG
• New York - 37 Misc.3d 518, 2012-22227, Justinian Capital SPC ex rel. Blue Heron Segregated Portfolio v. WestLB AG
• New York - 43 Misc.3d 598, 2014-24046, Justinian Capital SPC v. WestLB AG
• New York - 88 N.Y. 62, Moses v. McDivitt
• New York - 3 N.Y.2d 1, New Amsterdam Cas. Co. v. Stecker
• New York - 12 N.Y.3d 316, 2009-02483, Ferluckaj v. Goldman Sachs & Co.
• New York - 13 N.Y.3d 190, 2009-07323, Trust For the Certificate Holders of Merrill Lynch Mortgage Investors, Inc. v. Love Funding Corp.
• Pennsylvania - 148 A.3d 812 (Pa.Super. 2016), 1985 EDA 2015, WFIC, LLC v. LaBarre
• New York - 28 N.Y.3d 160, 2016-07047, Justinian Capital SPC v. WestLB AG
• New York - 28 N.Y.3d 178, 2016-07105, People v. Ocasio