'A FEW ARMED (DRONES), JUDICIOUSLY STATIONED, MIGHT AT A SMALL EXPENSE BE MADE USEFUL SENTINELS OF THE LAW': THE SUFFICIENCY OF EXISTING LAW AS APPLIED TO THE U.S. COAST GUARD'S INEVITABLE USE OF UNMANNED AIRCRAFT CAPABLE OF EMPLOYING AIRBORNE USE OF FORCE IN THE MARITIME COUNTER-DRUG MISSION.
›
Linked as:Extract
'A FEW ARMED (DRONES), JUDICIOUSLY STATIONED, MIGHT AT A SMALL EXPENSE BE MADE USEFUL SENTINELS OF THE LAW': THE SUFFICIENCY OF EXISTING LAW AS APPLIED TO THE U.S. COAST GUARD'S INEVITABLE USE OF UNMANNED AIRCRAFT CAPABLE OF EMPLOYING AIRBORNE USE OF FORCE IN THE MARITIME COUNTER-DRUG MISSION.
No longer available (Autolink)
See the full content of this document
This document cites
- Federal Cases - 198 F.3d 353 (2nd Cir. 1999), 97-9389, Leblanc and Ossen v Cleveland, Grant, et al
- Federal Cases - 686 F.2d 890 (11th Cir. 1982), 81-5607, United States v. Stuart-Caballero
- Federal Cases - 617 F.2d 35 (4th Cir. 1980), 79-5016, United States v. Harper
- Federal Cases - 617 F.2d 1063 (5th Cir. 1980), 78-5413, United States v. Williams
- Federal Cases - 624 F.2d 32 (5th Cir. 1980), 79-5431, United States v. Hicks
