Feeney v Pollexfen and Company

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• Factory and Workshop Act 1901 - Articles : S-79
• Factory and Workshop Act 1901 - Articles : S-104
• Docks Regulations, 1928

[See more]

• Haddock v Humphrey
• Wigmore, Administratrix of Charles Wigmore, Deceased v Jay

REFERS TO

• Lovegrove v The London, Brighton, and South Coast Railway Company Gallagher v Piper and Another
• Kenny v Harrison
• Watson v Cotton

[See more]

• Monaghan v Rhodes & Son
• Bissett v Heiton & Company
• Norman v Great Western Railway Company
• Wakelin v London and South-Western Railway Company
• Mersey Docks and Harbour Board v Procter
• Priestley and Fowler
• Tozeland v West Ham Union

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• 65 ILTR 161
• [1931] IR 589 (Digest)
• [1931] IR 589

REFERRED in

• Meagher v Luke J Healy Pharmacy Ltd

This document cites

• Smith (Pauper) v Charles Baker and Sons
• Mersey Docks and Harbour Board v Procter
• Nimmo (James) & Company v Connell
• Haddock v Humphrey
• Kenny v Harrison



See all quotations

• Norman v Great Western Railway Company
• Sarah Riley, Administratrix of John Riley v Joseph Baxendale and Others
• Wigmore, Administratrix of Charles Wigmore, Deceased v Jay
• Wakelin v London and South-Western Railway Company
• Priestley and Fowler
• Tozeland v West Ham Union
• Bissett v Heiton & Company
• Lovegrove v The London, Brighton, and South Coast Railway Company Gallagher v Piper and Another
• Coldrick v Partridge, Jones & Company Ltd
• Watson v Cotton
• Monaghan v Rhodes & Son
• Workmen's Compensation Act 1906
• Merchant Shipping Act 1894
• Fogarty v Wallis & Company
• Docks Regulations, 1928