Extract
Excalibur Ventures LLC v Texas Keystone Inc. and Others
No longer available (Autolink)
See the full content of this document
Core Citations
REFERS TO
CITES
CONSIDERS
CITED in
REFERRED in
CONSIDERED in
-
Seyed Mohamad Zaki Mousavi-Khalkali v Mahmoudreza Abrishamchi
-
JSC Commercial Bank Privatbank v Igor Valeryevich Kolomoisky
-
Duncan Kenric Swift (as trustee of the estates in bankruptcy of Nihal Brake and Andrew Brake) v Nihal Mohammed Kamal Brake
[See more]
-
VTB Bank (PJSC) v Mr Dmytro Firtash
-
The Official Receiver v David Philip Arron
-
CBPE Capital Fund VIII A LP v Dr Mohamed Taranissi
-
Nax (A Protected Party, Suing by His Wife and Litigation Friend, Jax) v Max
-
Clare Alison Laird (as executor and trustee of the estate of Robert John Simcock) v Catherine Anne Lowder Simcock (as executor, trustee and beneficiary of the estate of Robert John Simcock)
-
Allianz Global Investors GmbH & Others v G4S Plc
-
Say Chong Lim v Chee Kong Ong
-
Imran Arif v Dalbir Singh Sanger
-
Timothy David Dunbabin v Simon Charles Dunbabin
-
Manuel Mathieu v Tony Martin Hinds
-
Ineos Upstream Ltd v Joseph Boyd
-
Koza Ltd v Koza Altin Isletmeleri as
-
Mr Oluseye Aderounmu v Dr Deborah Colvin
-
Chedington Events Ltd v Nihal Mohamed Brake
-
Jušte Puharic v Silverbond Enterprises Ltd
-
School Facility Management Ltd v Governing Body of Christ the King College
-
Chedington Events Ltd v Nihal Mohammed Kamal Brake
-
Nihal Mohammed Kamal Brake v Simon Lowes
-
Axnoller Events Ltd v Nihal Mohammed Kamal Brake
-
International Game Technology Plc v The Gambling Commission
-
Celestial Aviation Services Ltd v Unicredit Bank Ag, London Branch
-
Invenia Technical Computing Corporation v Matthew Hudson
-
CXS v Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells NHS FT
-
European Film Bonds A/S v Lotus Holdings LLC
-
John Kent v William Paterson-Brown
-
Farol Holdings Ltd v Clydesdale Bank Plc
-
PDVSA Servicios S.A. v Clyde & Company LLP
-
Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd v Astellas Pharma Inc.
-
Terence Philip Ramsden v The Commissioners for HM Revenue and Customs
-
Dana Gas PJSC v (1) Dana Gas Sukuk Ltd
-
Philip Price v Flitcraft Ltd
-
Cabo Concepts Ltd v MGA Entertainment (UK) Ltd
-
ABFA Commodities Trading Ltd (formerly VTB Commodities Trading DAC) (previously, VTB Capital Trading Ltd) v Petraco Oil Company SA
-
Charles Elphicke v Times Media Ltd (formerly Times Newspapers Ltd)
-
Carmela De Sena v Joseph Notaro
-
Matrix Receivables Ltd v Musst Holdings Ltd
-
(1) Kazakhstan Kagazy Plc v (1) Baglan Abdullayevich Zhunus (formerly Baglan Abdullayevich Zhunussov)
-
Titan Wealth Holdings Ltd v Marian Okunola
-
The Companies Act (2021 Revision) and Principal Investing Fund I Ltd and Long View II Ltd and Global Fixed Income Fund I Ltd Credit Suisse London Nominees Ltd Petitioner v Principal Investing Fund I Ltd Long View II Ltd Global Fixed Income Fund I Ltd First Respondents and Floreat Principal Investment Management Ltd LV II Investment Management Ltd Floreat Investment Management Ltd Second Respondents
-
Yangtze Navigation (Asia) Company, Ltd v TPT Shipping Ltd
-
The Companies Act (2022 Revision) and Virginia Solution SPC Ltd Between: Valley Health System Petitioner v Augusta Healthcare, Inc. Respondent
-
The Companies Act (2021 Revision) and Principal Investing Fund I Ltd and Long View II Ltd and Global Fixed Income Fund I Ltd Credit Suisse London Nominees Ltd Petitioner v Principal Investing Fund I Ltd Long View II Ltd Global Fixed Income Fund I Ltd First Respondents and Floreat Principal Investment Management Ltd LV II Investment Management Ltd Floreat Investment Management Ltd Second Respondents
-
Valley Health System v Augusta Healthcare, Inc.
-
An Application by Cayman Shores Development Ltd and Palm Sunshine Ltd under section 140(1) of the Registered Land Act (Revised) (the Act ) or alternatively under section 96 of the Act and an Application by Cayman Shores Development Ltd and Palm Sunshine Ltd, pursuant to section 96 of the Act, that certain rights under certain restrictive agreements registered against Block 12D 108 and Block 12C 27 be wholly or partially extinguished or modified Between: (1) Cayman Shores Development Ltd (2) Palm Sunshine Ltd Plaintiffs v (1) The Registrar of Lands (2) The Proprietors, Strata Plan No. 79 (known as Lion's Court) (3) The Proprietors, Strata Plan No. 147 (known as Regent's Court) (4) The Proprietors, Strata Plan No. 215 (known as King's Court) (5) The Britann
-
An Application by Cayman Shores Development Ltd and Palm Sunshine Ltd under section 140(1) of the Registered Land Act (Revised) (the Act ) or alternatively under section 96 of the Act and an Application by Cayman Shores Development Ltd and Palm Sunshine Ltd, pursuant to section 96 of the Act, that certain rights under certain restrictive agreements registered against Block 12D 108 and Block 12C 27 be wholly or partially extinguished or modified Between: (1) Cayman Shores Development Ltd (2) Palm Sunshine Ltd Plaintiffs v (1) The Registrar of Lands (2) The Proprietors, Strata Plan No. 79 (known as Lion's Court) (3) The Proprietors, Strata Plan No. 147 (known as Regent's Court) (4) The Proprietors, Strata Plan No. 215 (known as King's Court) (5) The Britann
-
An Application by Cayman Shores Development Ltd and Palm Sunshine Ltd under section 140(1) of the Registered Land Act (Revised) (the Act ) or alternatively under section 96 of the Act and an Application by Cayman Shores Development Ltd and Palm Sunshine Ltd, pursuant to section 96 of the Act, that certain rights under certain restrictive agreements registered against Block 12D 108 and Block 12C 27 be wholly or partially extinguished or modified Between: (1) Cayman Shores Development Ltd (2) Palm Sunshine Ltd Plaintiffs v (1) The Registrar of Lands (2) The Proprietors, Strata Plan No. 79 (known as Lion's Court) (3) The Proprietors, Strata Plan No. 147 (known as Regent's Court) (4) The Proprietors, Strata Plan No. 215 (known as King's Court) (5) The Britann
-
Caroline Jill Crowther v Paul Anthony Crowther
-
An Application by Cayman Shores Development Ltd and Palm Sunshine Ltd under section 140(1) of the Registered Land Act (Revised) (the Act ) or alternatively under section 96 of the Act and an Application by Cayman Shores Development Ltd and Palm Sunshine Ltd, pursuant to section 96 of the Act, that certain rights under certain restrictive agreements registered against Block 12D 108 and Block 12C 27 be wholly or partially extinguished or modified Between: (1) Cayman Shores Development Ltd (2) Palm Sunshine Ltd Plaintiffs v (1) The Registrar of Lands (2) The Proprietors, Strata Plan No. 79 (known as Lion's Court) (3) The Proprietors, Strata Plan No. 147 (known as Regent's Court) (4) The Proprietors, Strata Plan No. 215 (known as King's Court) (5) The Britann
-
Argus Media Ltd v Mr Mounir Halim Judgment
-
FM Capital Partners Ltd v Marino and Others
-
Dexia S.A. v Regione Emilia Romagna
RELIED UPON in
APPLIED in