État belge v LO and Others.

Core Citations

WORK EXPRESSION OF

• État belge v LO and Others.

This document cites

• Tigers GmbH v Hauptzollamt Landshut.
• Brasserie du Pêcheur SA v Bundesrepublik Deutschland and The Queen v Secretary of State for Transport, ex parte: Factortame Ltd and others.
• Kühne & Heitz NV v Produktschap voor Pluimvee en Eieren.
• Deutsche Umwelthilfe eV v Freistaat Bayern.
• Council Directive 91/670/EEC of 16 December 1991 on mutual acceptance of personnel licences for the exercise of functions in civil aviation



See all quotations

• Commission Regulation (EU) No 1178/2011 of 3 November 2011 laying down technical requirements and administrative procedures related to civil aviation aircrew pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 216/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council (Text with EEA relevance)
• Regulation (EC) No 1592/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 July 2002 on common rules in the field of civil aviation and establishing a European Aviation Safety Agency (Text with EEA relevance)
• Regulation (EC) No 216/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 February 2008 on common rules in the field of civil aviation and establishing a European Aviation Safety Agency, and repealing Council Directive 91/670/EEC, Regulation (EC) No 1592/2002 and Directive 2004/36/EC (Text with EEA relevance)
• Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union 2016/C 202/01
• Directive 2004/36/CE of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 April 2004 on the safety of third-country aircraft using Community airports
• Commission Regulation (EU) 2018/1119 of 31 July 2018 amending Regulation (EU) No 1178/2011 as regards declared training organisations
• Arrêt de la Cour (grande chambre) du 14 mai 2020.#FMS et FNZ contre Országos Idegenrendészeti Főigazgatóság Dél-alföldi Regionális Igazgatóság et Országos Idegenrendészeti Főigazgatóság.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Politique d’asile et d’immigration – Directive 2013/32/UE – Demande de protection internationale – Article 33, paragraphe 2 – Motifs d’irrecevabilité – Article 40 – Demandes ultérieures – Article 43 – Procédures à la frontière – Directive 2013/33/UE – Article 2, sous h), et articles 8 et 9 – Rétention – Légalité – Directive 2008/115/UE – Article 13 – Voies de recours effectives – Article 15 – Rétention – Légalité – Droit à un recours effectif – Article 47 de la charte des droits fondamentaux de l’Union européenne – Principe de primauté du droit de l’Union.#Affaire C-924/19 PPU.
• Criminal proceedings against AZ.