Esure Insurance Ltd v Direct Line Insurance Plc

Core Citations

---

CONSIDERS

• O2 Holdings Ltd (formerly O2 Ltd) v Hutchison 3G Ltd (No 2)
• Sabel BV v Puma AG (Case C-251/95)
• AUDI-MED Trade Mark

[See more]

• L'Oréal SA and Others v Bellure NV (Case C-487/07)
• Norowzian v Arks Ltd (No 2)
• South Cone Inc. v Bessant and Others (t/a Reef)
• Piglowski v Piglowski
• Intel Corporation Inc. v CPM United Kingdom Ltd (C-252/07)
• British Sugar Plc v James Robertson & Sons Ltd
• Intel Corporation v Sihra
• Pro Sieben Media A.G. v Carlton U.K. Television Ltd

REFERS TO

• Re Harris Simons Construction Ltd
• O2 Holdings Ltd v Hutchison 3G UK Ltd (No 1)
• Hachette Filipacchi Presse SA v Saprotex International (Proprietary) Ltd

RESUELVE RECURSO

• Esure Insurance Ltd v Direct Line Insurance Plc

CONSIDERS

• Trade Marks Act 1994 - Articles : S-5
• Trade Marks Act 1994

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [2007] 30 IPD 30053
• 2008 RPC 6

CONSIDERED in

• Solland International Ltd and Others v Clifford Harris & Company

CITED in

• MedImmune Ltd v Novartis Pharmaceuticals UK Ltd and another, Novartis Pharmaceuticals UK Ltd v MedImmune Ltd and another

REFERRED in

• Tripadvisor LLC v Handsam Ltd

NOT FOLLOWED in

• Staywell Hospitality Group Pty Ltd v Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide, Inc.

APPEAL RESOLVED in

• Esure Insurance Ltd v Direct Line Insurance Plc

This document cites

---

• South Cone Inc. v Bessant and Others (t/a Reef)
• Hachette Filipacchi Presse SA v Saprotex International (Proprietary) Ltd
• Piglowski v Piglowski
• O2 Holdings Ltd v Hutchison 3G UK Ltd (No 1)
• L'Oréal SA and Others v Bellure NV (Case C-487/07)



See all quotations

• O2 Holdings Ltd (formerly O2 Ltd) v Hutchison 3G Ltd (No 2)
• Intel Corporation Inc. v CPM United Kingdom Ltd (C-252/07)
• Norowzian v Arks Ltd (No 2)
• AUDI-MED Trade Mark
• Pro Sieben Media A.G. v Carlton U.K. Television Ltd
• Norowzian v Arks Ltd (No 2)
• British Sugar Plc v James Robertson & Sons Ltd
• Re Harris Simons Construction Ltd
• Sabel BV v Puma AG (Case C-251/95)
• Intel Corporation v Sihra
• Trade Marks Act 1994
• Trade Marks Rules 2000
• Vedial SA v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
• Marca Mode CV contra Adidas AG y Adidas Benelux BV.
• Windsurfing Chiemsee Produktions- und Vertriebs GmbH (WSC) contra Boots- und Segelzubehör Walter Huber y Franz Attenberger.
• Vedial SA v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
• Spa Monopole, compagnie fermière de Spa SA/NV v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
• Phillips-Van Heusen Corp. v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
• SIGLA SA v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
• Adidas-Salomon AG and Adidas Benelux BV v Fitnessworld Trading Ltd.
• SABEL BV contra Puma AG, Rudolf Dassler Sport.