Estop in the name of love: a case for constructive marriage in Virginia.

This document cites

• Federal Cases - 316 U.S. 527 (1942), 644, Helvering v. Cement Investors, Inc.
• Federal Cases - 125 U.S. 190 (1888), Maynard v. Hill
• Federal Cases - 388 U.S. 1 (1967), 395, Loving v. Virginia
• California - 18 Cal.3d 660, 30520, Marvin v. Marvin
• Virginia - 119 S.E. 65 (Va. 1923), Vanderpool v. Ryan



See all quotations

• Virginia - 146 S.E. 289 (Va. 1929), Johnson v. Commonwealth
• Virginia - 181 S.E. 393 (Va. 1935), Newsom v. Fleming
• Virginia - 40 S.E. 910 (Va. 1902), Offield v. Davis
• Virginia - 99 S.E. 695 (Va. 1919), Reynolds v. Adams
• Virginia - 21 S.E.2d 761 (Va. 1942), McClaugherty v. McClaugherty
• Virginia - 224 S.E.2d 148 (Va. 1976), 750537, T--- v. T---
• Virginia - 238 S.E.2d 805 (Va. 1977), 761525, Cooper v. Spencer
• Virginia - 350 S.E.2d 600 (Va. 1986), 831124, Petachenko v. Petachenko
• Virginia - 380 S.E.2d 178 (Va.App. 1989), 0576-88-3, NPA v. WBA
• Virginia - 415 S.E.2d 135 (Va. 1992), 910604, Schweider v. Schweider
• Virginia - 416 S.E.2d 40 (Va.App. 1992), 0362-91-4, Frey v. Frey
• Virginia - 535 S.E.2d 187 (Va.App. 2000), 2265-99-3, Rickman v. Commonwealth
• Washington - 30 P. 651 (Wash. 1892), In re McLaughlin's Estate
• Washington - 678 P.2d 328 (Wash. 1984), 49837-7, Matter of Marriage of Lindsey