Entity theory as myth in the origins of the corporate income tax.

This document cites

• Federal Cases - 28 F. 776 (S.D.N.Y. 1886), Mercantile Nat. Bank v. City of New York
• Federal Cases - 6 F. 417 (N.D.N.Y. 1881), Albany City Nat. Bank v. Maher
• Federal Cases - 19 F. 372 (S.D.Ohio 1884), Exchange Nat. Bank v. Miller
• Federal Cases - 21 F. 484 (D.Ky. 1884), Covington City Nat. Bank v. City of Covington
• Federal Cases - 136 U.S. 549 (1890), Gibbons v. Mahon



See all quotations

• Federal Cases - 102 U.S. 148 (1880), Graham v. La Crosse & M.r. Co.
• Federal Cases - 157 U.S. 429 (1895), 898, Pollock v. Farmers' Loan and Trust Company
• Federal Cases - 158 U.S. 601 (1895), 898, Pollock v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Company (Rehearing)
• Federal Cases - 161 U.S. 134 (1896), Bank of Commerce v. Tennessee for Use of Memphis
• Federal Cases - 161 U.S. 149 (1896), 766, Shelby County v. Union and Planters' Bank
• Federal Cases - 17 U.S. 518 (1819), Trustees Of Dartmouth College v. Woodward
• Federal Cases - 192 U.S. 397 (1904), 103, Spreckels Sugar Refining Company v. McClain
• Federal Cases - 36 U.S. 420 (1837), Proprietors Of Charles River Bridge v. Proprietors Of Warren Bridge
• Federal Cases - 288 U.S. 517 (1933), 301, Louis K. Liggett Co. v. Lee
• Federal Cases - 117 U.S. 129 (1886), State of Tennessee v. Whitworth
• Federal Cases - 119 U.S. 265 (1886), City of New Orleans v. Houston
• Georgia - 25 S.E. 326 (Ga. 1895), Exchange Bank v. Macon Const. Co.
• Michigan - 31 Mich. 76 (Mich. 1875), Lockhart v. Van Alstyne