Enerpol, LLC v. Schlumberger Tech. Corp.

Core Citations

REVERSES OTHER CASE

• Apple Inc. v. Samsung Elecs. Co.

This document cites

• Federal Cases - Merck & Co. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals Usa
• Federal Cases - Exmark Mfg. Co. v. Briggs & Stratton Power Prods. Grp., LLC
• Federal Cases - O2 Micro Intern. v. Beyond Innovation Technology
• Federal Cases - Group One, Ltd. v. Hallmark Cards, Inc.
• Federal Cases - Eplus, Inc. v. Lawson Software, Inc., 2011-1396



See all quotations

• Federal Cases - Teva Pharm. USA, Inc. v. Sandoz, Inc.
• Federal Cases - Southwall Technologies, Inc. v. Cardinal IG Co.
• Federal Cases - Apple Inc. v. Samsung Elecs. Co.
• Federal Cases - Nautilus, Inc. v. Biosig Instruments, Inc.
• Federal Cases - Athletic Alternatives, Inc. v. Prince Mfg., Inc., 95-1045
• Federal Cases - Aylus Networks, Inc. v. Apple Inc.
• Federal Cases - Phillips v. Awh Corp.
• Federal Cases - Biovail Corp International v. Galephar Inc
• Federal Cases - Standard Oil Co. v. American Cyanamid Co.
• Federal Cases - Chef America, Inc. v. Lamb-Weston, Inc.
• Federal Cases - Microsoft Corp. v. Multi-Tech Systems, Inc.
• Federal Cases - Liebel-Flarsheim Company v. Medrad, Inc., 03-1082.
• Federal Cases - Medrad, Inc. v. Mri Devices Corp.
• US - Reference Stubs - Specification
• US - Reference Stubs - Conditions for patentability; non-obvious subject matter
• US - Reference Stubs - Conditions for patentability; novelty