Empire, Trade, and the Use of Agents in the 19th Century: The 'Reception' of the Undisclosed Principal Rule in Louisiana Law and Scots Law
› ›
Linked as:Extract
Empire, Trade, and the Use of Agents in the 19th Century: The 'Reception' of the Undisclosed Principal Rule in Louisiana Law and Scots Law
No longer available (Autolink)
See the full content of this document
This document cites
- Louisiana - 3 La.Ann. 401 (La. 1848), Ballister v. Hamilton
- Louisiana - 5 La.Ann. 15 (La. 1850), Carlisle v. Eudora
- Louisiana - 3 La.App. 335 (La.App. 1925), 10,192, Valmont Service Station v. Avegno
- Louisiana - 121 So. 248 (La.App. 2 Cir. 1928), 3404, Childers v. Police Jury of the Parish of Ouachita, La.
- Louisiana - 29 So.2d 852 (La. 1947), 38162, Sentell v. Richardson
