EE Ltd v Office of Communications Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport and Others (Interested Parties)

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• Raymond v Honey

CONSIDERS

• Wireless Telegraphy Act 1998
• Prison Act 1952
• Office of Communications Act 2002

[See more]

• Communications Act 2003 - Articles : S-3
• Communications Act 2003 - Articles : S-4
• Communications Act 2003 - Articles : S-5
• The Wireless Telegraphy (Licence Charges for the 900 MHz frequency band and the 1800 MHz frequency band) (Amendment and Further Provisions) Regulations 2015
• The Wireless Telegraphy Act 2006 (Directions to OFCOM) Order 2010
• Wireless Telegraphy Act 1998 - Articles : S-1
• Office of Communications Act 2002
• Communications Act 2003
• Wireless Telegraphy Act 2006

REFERS TO

• R (The Noble Organisation Ltd) v Thanet District Council
• Ghaidan v Godin-Mendoza

CITES

• HM Revenue and Customs v IDT Card Services Ireland Ltd
• British Telecommunications Plc v Office of Communications

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [2016] All ER D 19 Sep

REFERRED in

• R (on the application of Avaaz Foundation) v The Office of Communications (Ofcom)
• Ee Ltd v Office of Communications Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport and Others (Interested Parties)
• Vodafone Ltd v The Office of Communications

REVERSED in

• Ee Ltd v Office of Communications Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport and Others (Interested Parties)

CONSIDERED in

• Vodafone Ltd v The Office of Communications

This document cites

• HM Revenue and Customs v IDT Card Services Ireland Ltd
• R (The Noble Organisation Ltd) v Thanet District Council
• Ghaidan v Godin-Mendoza
• Raymond v Honey
• British Telecommunications Plc v Office of Communications



See all quotations

• Wireless Telegraphy Act 1998
• Office of Communications Act 2002
• Wireless Telegraphy Act 2006
• Communications Act 2003
• Prison Act 1952
• European Commission v Federal Republic of Germany.
• Vodafone España SA v Ayuntamiento de Santa Amalia (C‑55/11) Ayuntamiento de Tudela (C‑57/11) and France Telecom España SA v Ayuntamiento de Torremayor (C‑58/11).
• Erich Ciola contra Land Vorarlberg.
• i-21 Germany GmbH (C-392/04) and Arcor AG & Co. KG (C-422/04) v Bundesrepublik Deutschland.
• T-Mobile Austria GmbH v Telekom-Control-Kommission.
• Belgacom SA and Others v Belgian State.
• Amia SpA v Provincia Regionale di Palermo.
• Marleasing SA v La Comercial Internacional de Alimentacion SA.
• Directive 2002/20/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on the authorisation of electronic communications networks and services (Authorisation Directive)
• Directive 2009/114/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 September 2009 amending Council Directive 87/372/EEC on the frequency bands to be reserved for the coordinated introduction of public pan-European cellular digital land-based mobile communications in the Community (Text with EEA relevance)
• Directive 2002/21/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on a common regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services (Framework Directive)
• Amministrazione dello Finanze della Stato v Simmenthal S.p.A. (Case 106/77)