Eddis v Chichester Constable

Core Citations

---

RESUELVE RECURSO

• Eddis v Chichester Constable

CONSIDERS

• Limitation Act 1939 - Articles : S-3
• Limitation Act 1939 - Articles : S-26
• Limitation Act 1939 - Articles : S-31

[See more]

• Beaman v A.R.T.S. Ltd

REFERS TO

• Miller v Dell
• Gibbs v Guild
• Wilkinson v Verity

[See more]

• Clark, Administratrix of John Clark, against Hougham
• Asher v Seaford Court Estates
• Clayton v Le Roy
• Betts v Receiver for the Metropolitan Police District and Carter Paterson & Company Ltd
• Bulli Coal Mining Company v Osborne
• Rolfe v Gregory
• Bree against Holbech
• Granger against George
• Blair v Bromley

CITES

• Ministry of Health v Simpson (sub nom Re Diplock, Diplock v Wintle)
• Robison v Simmonds

AFFIRMS

• Eddis v Chichester Constable

APPROVES

• Baker (G. L.) Ltd v Medway Building and Supplies Ltd

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1969] 2 All ER 912
• [1969] 3 WLR 48
• [1969] 2 CH 345

CONSIDERED in

• Frank Ernest William Levy v Maxwell James Watt & Michael Ian Watt
• Criminal Assets Bureau v Marlene Walsh
• JSC BTA Bank v Mukhtar Ablyazov

CITED in

• COMPAGNIE NOGA DIMPORTATION Et DEXPORTATION SA and NESSIM D. GAON and 1) AUSTRALIA and NEW ZEALAND BANKING GROUP Ltd and Mrs MARYAM ABACHA and Mr MOHAMMED SANI ABACHA as Personal Representatives of GENERAL SANI ABACHA deceased and CHIEF ANTHONY A. ANI

REFERRED in

• New Guarantee Trust Finance Ltd v Birbeck

APPLIED in

• JSC BTA Bank v Mukhtar Ablyazov and Another

This document cites

---

• Clayton v Le Roy
• Beaman v A.R.T.S. Ltd
• Clark, Administratrix of John Clark, against Hougham
• Bree against Holbech
• Granger against George



See all quotations

• Miller v Dell
• Eddis v Chichester Constable
• Ministry of Health v Simpson (sub nom Re Diplock, Diplock v Wintle)
• Baker (G. L.) Ltd v Medway Building and Supplies Ltd
• Blair v Bromley
• Robison v Simmonds
• Bulli Coal Mining Company v Osborne
• Asher v Seaford Court Estates
• Gibbs v Guild
• Betts v Receiver for the Metropolitan Police District and Carter Paterson & Company Ltd
• Rolfe v Gregory
• Wilkinson v Verity