Durham v. State
Linked as:
Extract
Durham v. State
No longer available (Autolink)
See the full content of this document
This document cites
- Alabama - Harley-Davidson, Inc. v. Toomey
- Alabama - Sweeney v. Purvis
- US - Reference Stubs - Institution of proceedings for condemnation of vehicles, etc.; seized property not to be retaken by replevin or detinue during pendency of action; intervention by parties claiming superior right to seized property; powers of court to regulate proceedings to permit parties claiming vehicles, etc., to assert rights
- US - Reference Stubs - Ala. Code § 20-2-93 (1975) Forfeitures; Seizures
