Dura Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Broudo: Not Really a Loss Causation Case

This document cites

• Federal Cases - 193 F.2d 461 (2nd Cir. 1952), 107, Birnbaum v. Newport Steel Corp.
• Federal Cases - 507 F.2d 374 (2nd Cir. 1974), 1009, Schlick v. Penn-Dixie Cement Corp.
• Federal Cases - 343 F.3d 189 (2nd Cir. 2003), 02-7503, Emergent Capital Inv. Management, LLC v. Stonepath Group, Inc.
• Federal Cases - 892 F.2d 680 (7th Cir. 1990), 88-3299, Bastian v. Petren Resources Corp.
• Federal Cases - 806 F.2d 1154 (3rd Cir. 1986), 85-1360, Peil v. Speiser



See all quotations

• Federal Cases - 116 F.3d 1441 (11th Cir. 1997), 95-2882, Robbins v. Koger Properties, Inc.
• Federal Cases - 933 F.2d 616 (8th Cir. 1991), 90-5107, In re Control Data Corp. Securities Litigation
• Federal Cases - 223 F.3d 165 (3rd Cir. 2000), 99-5355, Semerenko v Cendant Corp.
• Federal Cases - 69 F.Supp. 512 (E.D.Pa. 1946), Civ. A. 6203, Kardon v. National Gypsum Co.
• Federal Cases - 339 F.3d 933 (9th Cir. 2003), 01-57136, Broudo v. Dura Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
• Federal Cases - 485 U.S. 224 (1988), 86-279, Basic, Inc. v. Levinson
• Federal Cases - 544 U.S. 336 (2005), 03-932, Dura Pharm., Inc. v. Broudo
• Federal Cases - 421 U.S. 723 (1975), 74-124, Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug Stores
• Code of Federal Regulations - Employment of manipulative and deceptive devices