DPP v Nock (on Appeal from the Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)), ; DPP v Alsford (on Appeal from the Court of Appeal (Criminal Divisional)),

Core Citations

---

DISAPPROVES

• Partington v Williams

CONSIDERS

• Mulcahy v R
• Haggard v Mason
• R v Smith (Roger) ; Haughton v Smith

REFERS TO

• R v Husseyn (Note)
• Board of Trade v Owen
• R v Brown

CONSIDERS

• Theft Act 1968
• Theft Act 1968 - Articles : S-1
• Criminal Law Act 1977 - Articles : S-1

[See more]

• Misuse of Drugs Act 1971 - Articles : S-4
• R v Green (Harry)

RESUELVE RECURSO

• DPP v Nock

APPLIES

• Haughton v Smith

APPROVES

• R v Easom

REVERSES

• DPP v Nock

DISTINGUISHES

• Haggard v Mason

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1978] UKHL J0524-3
• [1978] 3 WLR 57
• 67 CrAppR 116

[See more]

• [1978] 142 JP 414
• [1978] 2 All ER 654
• [1978] AC 979

REFERRED in

• R v Walkington
• Attorney General's Reference (Nos. 1 and 2 of 1979)

DISTINGUISHED in

• R v Harris (Kevin)
• R v Bennett

CONSIDERED in

• R v El Azzi
• Aaron Mickael Bruce Rolls v The Queen
• Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Whitlam

[See more]

• Anderton v Ryan

CITED in

• R v Bajwa and Others

APPLIED in

• R v Fitzmaurice

This document cites

---

• R v Smith (Roger) ; Haughton v Smith
• Haughton v Smith
• R v Husseyn (Note)
• DPP v Nock
• R v Green (Harry)



See all quotations

• Partington v Williams
• Haggard v Mason
• R v Brown
• R v Brown
• Board of Trade v Owen
• R v Easom
• Haggard v Mason
• R v Percy Dalton (London) Ltd
• Mulcahy v R
• Misuse of Drugs Act 1971
• Criminal Law Act 1977
• Theft Act 1968