Douglas (Eaton) v R

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• Stafford v DPP; Luvaglio v DPP
• Taibo (Ellis) v R

CONSIDERS

• Criminal Appeal Act 1966
• Criminal Appeal Act 1907
• Criminal Appeal Act 1907 - Articles : S-4

[See more]

• Criminal Appeal Act 1995
• R v Goodway

DISTINGUISHES

• Mears (Byfield) v R
• R v Golder

REFERS TO

• R v Dehar
• Broadhurst v The Queen
• R v Strudwick (Kevin Vincent)

[See more]

• R v McNair
• R v Galbraith
• R v Court
• R v Fred Rosenburg and Phillip Rosenburg
• Bullock (Michael) v The State
• Stafford v DPP; Luvaglio v DPP
• R v Cooper (Sean)
• R v Pestano
• R v Maw
• R v Reid
• R v Lucas (Ruth)

CITES

• R v Simpson
• R v Crook (Thomas William)
• Aladesuru v The Queen

[See more]

• Ellis Taibo v R
• R v Hancox
• Pickersgill (Keith) v R
• R v Harron

FOLLOWS

• R v Burge ; R v Pegg

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [2001] 10 JJC 0801

This document cites

• R v Harron
• R v Lucas (Ruth)
• R v Galbraith
• R v Goodway
• R v Burge ; R v Pegg



See all quotations

• R v Cooper (Sean)
• Stafford v DPP; Luvaglio v DPP
• Pickersgill (Keith) v R
• R v Golder
• R v Maw
• R v Fred Rosenburg and Phillip Rosenburg
• R v Strudwick (Kevin Vincent)
• R v Pestano
• Stafford v DPP; Luvaglio v DPP
• R v Hancox
• R v Reid
• R v McNair
• Broadhurst v The Queen
• R v Simpson
• Ellis Taibo v R
• Mears (Byfield) v R
• Taibo (Ellis) v R
• R v Court
• R v Crook (Thomas William)
• Aladesuru v The Queen
• Bullock (Michael) v The State
• Criminal Appeal Act 1907
• Criminal Appeal Act 1966
• Criminal Appeal Act 1995