DIRECT SUITS AND DERIVATIVE ACTIONS: RETHINKING SHAREHOLDER PROTECTION IN COMPARATIVE CORPORATE LAW.

This document cites

• Aegon Capital Management Inc. et al. v. BCE Inc. et al., (2008) 383 N.R. 119 (SCC)
• Re Harmer (H. R) Ltd
• Hawkes v Cuddy and Others (Nos 1 & 2)
• Hawkes v Cuddy and Others (Nos 1 & 2)
• Alltrans Express Ltd v CVA Holdings Ltd



See all quotations

• Cordiant Communications (Australia) Pty Ltd v The Communications Group Holdings Pty Ltd
• Smith (Howard) Ltd v Ampol Petroleum Ltd
• Carpathian Resources Ltd v Hendriks
• Gambotto v Wcp Ltd
• Musselwhite v C. H. Musselwhite & Son Ltd
• Pender v Lushington
• Rembert v Daniel and another
• Thio Keng Poon v Thio Syn Pyn and others and another appeal
• Tullio v Maoro
• Mahtani and Others v Kiaw Aik Hang Land Pte Ltd
• 2005/5/EC: Commission Decision of 27 December 2004 setting out the arrangements for Community comparative trials and tests on seeds and propagating material of certain plants of agricultural and vegetable species and vine under Council Directives 66/401/EEC, 66/402/EEC, 68/193/EEC, 92/33/EEC, 2002/54/EC, 2002/55/EC, 2002/56/EC and 2002/57/EC for the years 2005 to 2009 (notified under document number C(2004) 5264)Text with EEA relevance
• Delaware - Smith v. Van Gorkom
• Delaware - In re Orchard Enters., Inc.
• Delaware - Weinberger v. UOP, Inc.