Dingley v Chief Constable of Strathclyde (No.1)

Afectaciones

CONSIDERA CASO

• Dingley v Chief Constable of Strathclyde (No.1)

REFIERE

• Benmax v Austin Motor Company Ltd
• Islip Pedigree Breeding Centre v Abercromby
• Brodie v British Rlys Board

[ver más]

• Smith New Court Securities Ltd v Scrimgeour Vickers (Asset Management) Ltd and Another
• Davie v Magistrates of Edinburgh
• Stephen v Scottish Boatowners Mutual Insurance Association
• Watt (or Thomas) v Thomas

RESUELVE RECURSO

• Dingley v Chief Constable of Strathclyde (No.1)

CONSIDERA

• Court of Session Act 1988 - Artículos : S-40

REPORTED OPINION OF por

• [2000] UKHL J0309-1
• [2000] 55 BMLR 1
• (2000) 255 NR 301

[ver más]

• 2000 SCLR 309

CITADA NEUTRALMENTE por

• APPLICATIONS by THE PRINCIPAL REPORTER UNDER SECTIONS 93(2) (a) and 94(2) (a) of THE CHILDREN'S HEARINGS (SCOTLAND) ACT 2011 THE PRINCIPAL REPORTER Against J. P. N and C. G
• Sienkiewicz v Greif (UK) Ltd; Knowsley Metropolitan Borough Council v Willmore

REFERIDA por

• Amy Whitehead's Legal Representative v Graeme John Douglas and another
• Tennant v Direct Line Insurance Plc

CONSIDERADA por

• Reid v Amaca Pty Ltd and Another
• Devere Wharton v Dennis Marshall

APLICADA por

• Re W (A Child) (non-accidental injury: expert evidence); sub nom Oldham Metropolitan Borough Council v GW and PW

Documentos citados

• Benmax v Austin Motor Company Ltd
• Watt (or Thomas) v Thomas
• Smith New Court Securities Ltd v Scrimgeour Vickers (Asset Management) Ltd and Another
• Stephen v Scottish Boatowners Mutual Insurance Association
• Dingley v Chief Constable of Strathclyde (No.1)



Ver todas las citas

• Davie v Magistrates of Edinburgh
• Islip Pedigree Breeding Centre v Abercromby
• Murad & Foo v Perbadanan Pembangunan Pulau Pinang; Ong Chin Lee
• Brodie v British Rlys Board
• Court of Session Act 1988