DIGITIZING TRIBAL LAW: HOW CODIFICATION PROJECTS SUCH AS TRIBAL LAW ONLINE COULD GIVE NEW RISE TO AMERICAN INDIAN SOVEREIGNTY.

This document cites

• Federal Cases - 746 F.3d 167 (5th Cir. 2014), 12-60668, Dolgencorp, Inc. v. Miss. Band of Choctaw Indians
• Federal Cases - 450 U.S. 544 (1981), 79-1128, Montana v. United States
• Federal Cases - 455 U.S. 130 (1982), 80-11, Merrion v. Jicarilla Apache Tribe
• Federal Cases - 520 U.S. 438 (1997), 95-1872, Strate v. A-1 Contractors
• Federal Cases - 532 U.S. 645 (2001), 00-454, Atkinson Trading Co, Inc. v. Shirley



See all quotations

• Federal Cases - 533 U.S. 353 (2001), 99-1994, Nevada v. Hicks
• Federal Cases - 554 U.S. 316 (2008), 07-411, Plains Commerce Bank v. Long Family Land and Cattle Company, Inc.
• Federal Cases - __ U.S. __ (2014), 12-515, Michigan v. Bay Mills Indian Community
• Federal Cases - 163 U.S. 376 (1898), 227, Talton v. Mayes
• Federal Cases - 187 U.S. 553 (1903), 275, Lone Wolf v. Hitchcock
• Federal Cases - 109 U.S. 556 (1883), Ex Parte Kan-gi-shun-ca
• Federal Cases - 118 U.S. 375 (1886), United States v. Kagama
• Federal Cases - 435 U.S. 191 (1978), 76-5729, Oliphant v. Suquamish Indian Tribe
• Federal Cases - 436 U.S. 49 (1978), 76-682, Santa Clara Pueblo v. Martinez
• Federal Cases - __ U.S. __ (2016), 13-1496, Dollar General Corp. v. Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians