Digipos Store Solutions Group Ltd v Digi International Inc.

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• Takeda Chemicals Ltd v Comptroller General of the Patent Office
• Bristol-Myers Squibb Company v Baker Norton Inc.

[See more]

• MADAME Trade Mark

REFERS TO

• Biogen Inc. v Medeva Plc
• Compass Publishing BV v Compass Logistics Ltd
• Russell Finex Ltd v Telsonic AG

[See more]

• Reed Executive Plc v Reed Solutions Plc
• Anheuser-Busch Inc. v Budejovicky Budvar Narodni Podnik (Application for Revocation); Bud and Budweiser Budrau Trade Marks
• South Cone Inc. v Bessant and Others (t/a Reef)
• British Sugar Plc v James Robertson & Sons Ltd

APPLIES

• Kirin-Amgen v Hoechst Marion Roussel Ltd

DISTINGUISHES

• Re Fiorelli Trade Mark Applications; Lunan Group Ltd v Edwin Company Ltd

CONSIDERS

• Trade Marks Act 1994 - Articles : S-3
• Trade Marks Act 1994 - Articles : S-5
• Trade Marks Act 1994

[See more]

• Patents Act 1977

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• 2008 RPC 24
• [2008] Bus LR 1621

CONSIDERED in

• Meemi Ltd v Wardrobe (Beautiful Clothes) Ltd

APPLIED in

• Tripadvisor LLC v Handsam Ltd
• Envirotecnic v Gutterclear UK Ltd

FOLLOWED in

• Société Des Produits Nestlé SA v Cadbury UK Ltd

This document cites

• Anheuser-Busch Inc. v Budejovicky Budvar Narodni Podnik (Application for Revocation); Bud and Budweiser Budrau Trade Marks
• Biogen Inc. v Medeva Plc
• South Cone Inc. v Bessant and Others (t/a Reef)
• Reed Executive Plc v Reed Solutions Plc
• Kirin-Amgen v Hoechst Marion Roussel Ltd



See all quotations

• Compass Publishing BV v Compass Logistics Ltd
• Re Fiorelli Trade Mark Applications; Lunan Group Ltd v Edwin Company Ltd
• Russell Finex Ltd v Telsonic AG
• MADAME Trade Mark
• British Sugar Plc v James Robertson & Sons Ltd
• Biogen Inc. v Medeva Plc
• Bristol-Myers Squibb Company v Baker Norton Inc.
• Takeda Chemicals Ltd v Comptroller General of the Patent Office
• Patents Act 1977
• Trade Marks Act 1994
• Devinlec Développement innovation Leclerc SA v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
• Windsurfing Chiemsee Produktions- und Vertriebs GmbH (WSC) contra Boots- und Segelzubehör Walter Huber y Franz Attenberger.
• Canon Kabushiki Kaisha v Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Inc., formerly Pathe Communications Corporation.
• T.I.M.E. ART Uluslararasi Saat Ticareti ve diş Ticaret AŞ v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) and Devinlec Développement Innovation Leclerc SA.
• José Alejandro, SL v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
• DKV Deutsche Krankenversicherung AG v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs).
• Lloyd Schuhfabrik Meyer & Co. GmbH contra Klijsen Handel BV.
• Commission of the European Communities v European Parliament and Council of the European Union.