Deolal Sukhram, Girjadath Sewpersaud and Jainarine Persaud v The State

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• R v Church
• Mohan v The Queen
• DPP v Ping Lin

[See more]

• Beckford v The Queen
• Mohammed (Fazal) v The State
• Berry v The Queen

CITES

• Cottle v The Queen
• R v Rennie
• Henry v The State

[See more]

• Bullock (Michael) v The State
• Jagessar and Bhola Nandlal v The State (No 1)
• R v Abdool Samad Abdul Salim and Roy Ralph
• The State v Lalta Persaud and Four Others
• R v Stephen Alexander and Don Mitchell
• Junior Cottle and Lorraine Laidlow v R
• Meli v The Queen
• The State v Colin Joseph de France
• François v The State
• R v Shoukatallie and Mohamed Ali
• Berry (Linton) v R

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• (1993) 44 WIR 400

CITED in

• Penny (Elvis) v The State
• Williams (Earl) v The State
• Williams (Hubert) v The State

CONSIDERED in

• Williams v R
• The State v Peters et Al
• The State v Peters

[See more]

• The State v Peters et Al
• Maduro v The Queen

APPLIED in

• Malcolm Maduro Appellant v The Queen Respondent

REFERRED in

• Malcolm Maduro Appellant v The Queen Respondent

This document cites

• DPP v Ping Lin
• R v Church
• R v Rennie
• R v Abdool Samad Abdul Salim and Roy Ralph
• The State v Lalta Persaud and Four Others



See all quotations

• The State v Colin Joseph de France
• Meli v The Queen
• R v Shoukatallie and Mohamed Ali
• Beckford v The Queen
• Berry v The Queen
• Mohammed (Fazal) v The State
• Junior Cottle and Lorraine Laidlow v R
• Berry (Linton) v R
• Cottle v The Queen
• Mohan v The Queen
• R v Stephen Alexander and Don Mitchell
• Bullock (Michael) v The State
• Jagessar and Bhola Nandlal v The State (No 1)
• Henry v The State
• François v The State