DCM (Optical Holdings) Ltd v Commissioners for HM Revenue and Customs
Linked as:
Extract
DCM (Optical Holdings) Ltd v Commissioners for HM Revenue and Customs
No longer available (Autolink)
See the full content of this document
Core Citations
CONSIDERS
- Value Added Tax Act 1994
- Value Added Tax Act 1994 - Articles : S-19
- Value Added Tax Act 1994 - Articles : S-25
[See more]
REFERS TO
- Capital One Developments Ltd v Commissioners of Customs and Excise
- Pegasus Birds Ltd v Commissioners of Customs and Excise (No 2)
- John Dee Ltd v Commissioners of Customs and Excise
[See more]
AFFIRMS
CONSIDERS
- John Dee Ltd v Commissioners of Customs and Excise
- BUPA Purchasing Ltd v HM Revenue and Customs
- Ex parte Preston (pet. all.)
REPORTED OPINION OF in
This document cites
- Capital One Developments Ltd v Commissioners of Customs and Excise
- R v Commissioners of Inland Revenue, ex parte Preston
- Grange (S. J.) Ltd v Commissioners of Customs and Excise
- HM Revenue and Customs v Marie Chamberlin
- R v Commissioners of Inland Revenue, ex parte National Federation of Self-Employed and Small Businesses Ltd