Davidson v Chirnside

Core Citations

---

DOES NOT FOLLOW

• Davidson v Armytage

REFERS TO

• Limmer Asphalte Paving Company Ltd v Commissioners of Inland Revenue
• The King against The Inhabitants of Ridgwell, in the County of Essex
• Sackville-West v Viscount Holmesdale

[See more]

• Re Player. ex parte Harvey

CITES

• Tennant v Smith
• Kane v Kane
• Kenworthy v Bate

[See more]

• Hamilton Russell v Commissioners of Inland Revenue

FOLLOWS

• Commissioner of Stamp Duties v Stephen

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• 7 CLR 324
• 14 Arg LR 686

CITED in

• Oswal v Commissioner of Taxation
• Commissioner of Stamp Duties (Queensland) v Hopkins
• Commissioner of Taxation v Commercial Nominees of Australia Ltd

[See more]

• Commissioner of Taxation v Commercial Nominees of Australia Ltd

REFERRED in

• Collector of Imposts (Victoria) v Cuming Campbell Investments Pty Ltd
• Commissioner of Stamp Duties (Queensland) v Hopkins
• Buzza v Comptroller of Stamps (Victoria)

DISTINGUISHED in

• Wedge v Acting Comptroller of Stamps (Victoria)
• Chief Commissioner of Stamp Duties v Buckle

CONSIDERED in

• Queensland Trustees v Commissioner of Stamp Duties (Queensland)
• Benidorm Pty Ltd v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue
• Harris et Al v Stamp Commission and the Attorney General

APPLIED in

• Perpetual Executors and Trustees Association of Australia Ltd v Wright

This document cites

---

• Hamilton Russell v Commissioners of Inland Revenue
• Kane v Kane
• Re Player. ex parte Harvey
• The King against The Inhabitants of Ridgwell, in the County of Essex
• Davidson v Armytage



See all quotations

• Limmer Asphalte Paving Company Ltd v Commissioners of Inland Revenue
• Kenworthy v Bate
• Commissioner of Stamp Duties v Stephen
• Tennant v Smith
• Sackville-West v Viscount Holmesdale