DAVID O'KEEFFE v PATRICK WALSH, JOHN CONDON, and Others

Core Citations

DISTINGUISHES

• Dawson v M'Clelland and Others

REFERS TO

• Chapleo v Brunswick Permanent Building Society (no 2)
• Child v Stenning
• Burnby, ex parte

[See more]

• Dally v Murray
• Brinsmead v Harrison
• Lyons (J.) & Sons v Wilkins (No. 2)
• Winterbottom v Lord Derby
• Kelner v Baxter
• Wilson and Another v Tumman and Fretson
• Inman v Wearing
• Consett v Bell
• Egmont (Earl of) v Smith. Smith v Egmont (Earl of)
• Bishop of Winchester v Knight
• Jesus College v Bloom
• National Provincial Plate Glass Insurance Company v Prudential Assurance Company
• Prudential Assurance Company v Knott
• O'Brien v Mitchelstown Loan Fund Society
• Secretary of State for War v Studdert
• Fulham, Lynch and McCarthy v McCarthy (Administrator of Alexander McCarthy) and Others
• R v James Watson
• Gower v Couldridge

CONSIDERS

• Smurthwaite v Hannay
• Jackson and Others v The Munster Bank Ltd and Others; ex parte Dease

[See more]

• Mayor of York v Pilkington and Others
• Frankenburg v Great Horseless Carriage Company
• Walters v Green

CITES

• Daniel O'Connell, John O'Connell, Thomas Matthew Ray, Thomas Steele, Charles Gavan Duffy, John Gray, and Richard Barrett, - Plaintiffs in Error; HM The Queen, - Defendant in Error

CONSIDERED in

• Lord Defreyne v Fitzgibbon and Others

This document cites

• Quinn v Leathem
• Chapleo v Brunswick Permanent Building Society (no 2)
• Mogul Steamship Company v McGregor
• Gower v Couldridge
• Lyons (J.) & Sons v Wilkins (No. 2)



See all quotations

• Frankenburg v Great Horseless Carriage Company
• Savile v Roberts
• Mayor of York v Pilkington and Others
• Mullins v Pratt
• Brinsmead v Harrison
• Prudential Assurance Company v Knott
• Bishop of Winchester v Knight
• Player against Warn and Dews
• Dally v Murray
• Burnby, ex parte
• Consett v Bell
• Kelner v Baxter
• Daniel O'Connell, John O'Connell, Thomas Matthew Ray, Thomas Steele, Charles Gavan Duffy, John Gray, and Richard Barrett, - Plaintiffs in Error; HM The Queen, - Defendant in Error
• Winterbottom v Lord Derby
• Inman v Wearing
• Hayward & Company v Hayward & Sons
• Fulham, Lynch and McCarthy v McCarthy (Administrator of Alexander McCarthy) and Others
• J Lyons & Sons v Wilkins (No.1)
• Child v Stenning
• Jackson and Others v The Munster Bank Ltd and Others; ex parte Dease
• National Provincial Plate Glass Insurance Company v Prudential Assurance Company
• Jesus College v Bloom
• Smurthwaite v Hannay
• Walters v Green
• Wilson and Another v Tumman and Fretson
• R v James Watson
• Egmont (Earl of) v Smith. Smith v Egmont (Earl of)
• O'Brien v Mitchelstown Loan Fund Society
• Dawson v M'Clelland and Others
• Secretary of State for War v Studdert