Dan v. Dan

Core Citations

ABROGATES OTHER CASE

• Balmer v. Balmer

RESUELVE RECURSO

• Dan v. Dan

REVERSES

• Dan v. Dan

SUPERSEDES

• Dan v. Dan

DISTINGUISHED in

• Rubenstein v. Rubenstein

This document cites

• New York - Balmer v. Balmer
• New York - Ward v. Ward
• Connecticut - Crowley v. Crowley
• Connecticut - Schwarz v. Schwarz
• Connecticut - Roach v. Roach



See all quotations

• New York - Jan S. v. Leonard S.
• New York - McMains v. McMains
• Maryland - Cole v. Cole
• Connecticut - Montoya v. Montoya, No. 17535.
• Florida - Demont v. Demont
• New York - Balmer v. Balmer
• Maine - Bridgwood v. Bridgwood
• Connecticut - Zahringer v. Zahringer
• Connecticut - Panganiban v. Panganiban, (AC 18072)
• Connecticut - Schwarz v. Schwarz
• Michigan - Burr v. Burr
• Connecticut - Dan v. Dan
• New Jersey - Crews v. Crews
• Arizona - Sheeley v. Sheeley
• Connecticut - Wood v. Wood
• Connecticut - McCann v. McCann
• Connecticut - Dan v. Dan
• Connecticut - Zahringer v. Zahringer
• New Hampshire - Calderwood v. Calderwood
• Illinois - Arnold v. Arnold
• Louisiana - Council v. Council
• New Jersey - Martindell v. Martindell
• New Jersey - Cox v. Cox
• Florida - Bedell v. Bedell
• Connecticut - Hardisty v. Hardisty
• Pennsylvania - Com. ex rel. Levy v. Levy
• Connecticut - Borkowski v. Borkowski
• Maryland - Lott v. Lott
• US - Reference Stubs - (Formerly Sec. 46-48). Stipulation of parties and finding of irretrievable breakdown
• US - Reference Stubs - Conn. Gen. Stat. § 46b-82 (Formerly Sec. 46-52). Alimony