S.d. (ap) For Judicial Review Of A Decision Of The Sheriff Taken On 22 December 2009 To Refuse The Petitioner's Application For Legal Aid

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• Act of Sederunt (Rules of the Court of Session 1994) 1994
• Legal Aid (Scotland) Act 1986 - Articles : S-29

DOES NOT FOLLOW

• Saunders, Petitioner

CITES

• Bain v Hugh LS McConnell Ltd
• Gupta's Trustee v Gupta
• Ho, Ho, Hong and Chin v Lord Advocate

[See more]

• K. v The Scottish Legal Aid Board
• Network Rail Infrastructure Ltd, Petitioner
• Reynolds v Christie
• Watt v Strathclyde Regional Council

FOLLOWS

• WILLIAM LAURISTON WEST Petitioner (Reclaimer) against SCOTTISH PRISON SERVICE Respondents
• Lord Advocate (as representing Commissioners of Customs and Excise) v Johnson

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [2010] GWD 17-332
• 2011 SLT 101

This document cites

• Gupta's Trustee v Gupta
• K. v The Scottish Legal Aid Board
• Bain v Hugh LS McConnell Ltd
• Network Rail Infrastructure Ltd, Petitioner
• Watt v Strathclyde Regional Council



See all quotations

• Ho, Ho, Hong and Chin v Lord Advocate
• WILLIAM LAURISTON WEST Petitioner (Reclaimer) against SCOTTISH PRISON SERVICE Respondents
• Saunders, Petitioner
• Lord Advocate (as representing Commissioners of Customs and Excise) v Johnson
• Reynolds v Christie
• RS Macdonald Charitable Trust Trustees v Scottish Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals
• Legal Aid (Scotland) Act 1986
• Children (Scotland) Act 1995