Cusack v Harrow London Borough Council
Linked as:
Extract
Cusack v Harrow London Borough Council
No longer available (Autolink)
See the full content of this document
Core Citations
CONSIDERS
CONSIDERS
- Human Rights Act 1998
- Town and Country Planning Act 1947
- Countryside and Rights of Way Act 2000
[See more]
REFERS TO
- Sporrong and Lönnroth v Sweden (App No 7151/75)
- R v Epping Forest DC, ex parte Philcox (Certificate: Unlawful Granting)
- JAMES AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
[See more]
RESUELVE RECURSO
CITES
- Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd v Wednesbury Corporation
- Thomas and Others v Bridgend County Borough Council
- Marshall v Blackpool Corporation
[See more]
REVERSES
DISTINGUISHES
REFERRED in
- Nicholas Courtauld Rayner v The Lord Chancellor
- BDW Trading Ltd v South Anglia Housing Ltd
- R Simon Dudfield v Forest of Dean District Council Tim Shayle, T/A Countryman Sports (Interested Party)
[See more]
CONSIDERED in
- MSM and Others (Wasted Costs, Effect of S.29(4))
- Siemens Hearing Instruments Ltd v Friends Life Ltd
- JJ Gallagher Ltd and Others v Cherwell District Council and Another
[See more]
CITED in
- Corporation of Hamilton v Attorney-General and the Centre for Justice
- Burke (Kevin) and Phyllis Burke v O’Kane and Devine Construction Limited
- Frank Savage v Raymond Savage
[See more]
REPORTED OPINION OF in
This document cites