Cummings v Stewart (No. 2)

Core Citations

REFERS TO

• Hayne and Another against Maltby
• Chanter v Leese, Cussons, and Diggle
• Hamlyn & Company v Wood & Company

[See more]

• Pordage v Cole

CONSIDERS

• Panama and South Pacific Telegraph Company v India Rubber, Gutta Percha, and Telegraph Works Company

CITES

• Rhodes v Forwood
• Roberts v Bury Improvement Commissioners
• Sourfield against Gowland

[See more]

• Mary Short against Stone
• Starkey v Barton
• Stavers v Curling and Another
• The London Gas-Light Company v The Vestry of Chelsea
• The Moorcock
• Upton v Townend
• Doe, on the Demise of Hanley, against Wood
• Aspden v Seddon
• Bastin v Bidwell
• Clark v Adie
• Ellen v Topp
• Ford against Tiley
• Frost v Knight
• Huggins against Coates
• Irish Society v Tyrrell
• Lovelock against Franklyn and Cox, Executors of Thomas Dell
• Planche v Colburn and Another

CITED in

• The Companies (Consolidation) Act, 1908 ; and the Irish Provident Assurance Company Ltd; and Johanna Bradley
• Zuphen v Kelly Technical

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1913] 1 IR 95

This document cites

• Hayne and Another against Maltby
• Hamlyn & Company v Wood & Company
• Doe, on the Demise of Hanley, against Wood
• Pordage v Cole
• Chanter v Leese, Cussons, and Diggle



See all quotations

• Rhodes v Forwood
• Lovelock against Franklyn and Cox, Executors of Thomas Dell
• Mary Short against Stone
• Irish Society v Tyrrell
• The Moorcock
• Ellen v Topp
• Sourfield against Gowland
• Starkey v Barton
• Roberts v Bury Improvement Commissioners
• Upton v Townend
• Planche v Colburn and Another
• Aspden v Seddon
• Chanter v Lees and Others
• Clark v Adie
• Stavers v Curling and Another
• Ford against Tiley
• Panama and South Pacific Telegraph Company v India Rubber, Gutta Percha, and Telegraph Works Company
• Frost v Knight
• Huggins against Coates
• Bastin v Bidwell
• The London Gas-Light Company v The Vestry of Chelsea
• Stavers v Curling and Another
• Landlord and Tenant Law Amendment (Ireland) Act 1860
• The Moorcock