Cumming v Danson

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• Rent and Mortgage Interest Restrictions (Amendment) Act 1933 - Articles : S-3
• Rent and Mortgage Interest Restrictions (Amendment) Act 1933

CONSIDERED in

• London Borough of Southwark v Adatola Erekin
• Montross Associated Investments SA v Gladys Christine Stone
• The Mayor and Burgesses of the London Borough of Haringey v Vincent Stewart and Another

[See more]

• Etherington v Burt
• Montross Associated Investments Sa v Gladys Christine Stone
• West Kent Housing Association Ltd (Plaintiff/Appellant) v Joseph Davies and Another
• Haringey London Borough Council v Stewart
• Sheffield City Council v Hopkins
• Leeds & Yorkshire Housing Association v Vertigan
• Lambeth London Borough Council v Howard
• The Council of the City of Newcastle Upon Tyne (Claimant/Appellant) v Christina Morrison
• Bracknell Forest Borough Council v Green and Another
• Ottway v Jones
• Cooper et Al v Wilson et Al
• Ram v Abdool
• Sue Chung Qui v Lucien
• Elias v Mansoor

REFERRED in

• Briddon v George
• Teign Housing v Richard Lane
• Regional Properties Company Ltd v Frankenschwerth and Chapman

[See more]

• Battlespring Ltd v Gates
• Bell London and Provincial Properties Ltd v Reuben
• Lee v Whitehouse
• City of Lincoln Council (Claimant/Appellant) v Michael Bird
• Manchester City Council v Higgins
• Poplar Housing & Regeneration Community Association Ltd v Ms Afsana Begum and Another
• Fitzpatrick v Sterling Housing Association Ltd
• Moat Housing Group-South Ltd v Harris and Another
• The King (on the application of Carly Jayne Willott) v Eastbourne Borough Council

CITED in

• John Kay Ltd v Kay
• Metropolitan Housing Trust Ltd v Hadjazi
• Ms Wendy Ann Holt v Reading Borough Council (Respondent/Claimant)

[See more]

• Harte and Another v Frampton
• City West Housing Trust v Lindsey Massey
• Gil v Baygreen Properties Ltd
• Southwark London Borough Council v Kofi-Adu
• Manchester City Council v Pinnock (Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government intervening)

APPLIED in

• Sabey (Clifford) (Contractors) Ltd v Long
• Rhodes v Cornford

FOLLOWED in

• Gunn Lay Teik and Another; Rajaratnam

DISTINGUISHED in

• Shaw & Shaw Ltd; Goh Chin Hock

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1942] 2 All ER 653
• 59 TLR 70
• [1942] 112 LJKB 145