Cox v Hakes

Core Citations

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• 6 TLR 465
• 15 APPCAS 506

REFERRED in

• Re Robertson's (JH) Application for Letters Patent
• Re J. M. Carroll
• Johnston's Pty Ltd v Nettleton

[See more]

• Dillingham Constructions Pty Ltd v Steel Mains Pty Ltd
• Henderson v Pioneer Homes Pty Ltd
• Commonwealth v Mccormack
• British Transport Commission v London County Council
• R v Macfarlane; ex parte O'flanagan and O'kelly
• Ex parte Walsh and Johnson; Re Yates
• Yirra Pty Ltd (T/as Richmond Demolition and Salvage) v Summerton
• Davern v Messel
• Philippson v Imperial Airways Ltd
• Attorney General for Saint Christopher and Nevis v Rodionov
• Re Onkar Shrian
• Eleko v Government of Nigeria
• The State (Dowling) v Kingston (No. 2)
• R v Staniforth ; DPP v Jordan
• Holmes v Bangladesh Biman Corporation
• Benson v Northern Ireland Road Transport Board
• Salinas de Gortari v Smithwick (No 2)
• State (DPP) v Walsh
• People v O'Shea
• Commissioners of Inland Revenue v Trustees of Sir John Aird's Settlement
• R v Secretary of State for Home Affairs, ex parte Greene
• Knowles v Government of the United States of America and another
• Donald Campbell and Company, Ltd and Others v Pollak
• Amand v Secretary of State for Home Affairs and Another

CITED in

• King-Emperor v Deshpande
• R ats Gunter v Tucker
• Felix v Thomas

[See more]

• Commissioner of Police v DePeiza
• Stoneham v Ryan's Removals Pty Ltd
• Cameron v Holt
• Zoeller v Federal Republic of Germany
• Liversidge v Anderson

DOUBTED in

• Re Hastings (No. 2)

CONSIDERED in

• Wall v R; ex parte King Won and Wah on
• Wall v R; ex parte King Won and Wah on
• Marsden, Donald v Taylor, Andrea Georgina

[See more]

• Commissioner of Police v Depeiza
• Considine v Shannon Regional Fisheries Board
• State (Browne) v Feran
• Felix v Burkett et Al
• Howard v Commissioners of Public Works
• Clarke v Member in Charge
• The State v Boyce

APPLIED in

• Secretary of State for Home Affairs v O'Brien
• The State (Burke) v Lennon and Attorney General

RELIED UPON in

• The Superintendent of HM Foxhill Prison and The Government of the United States of America v Viktor Kozeny

COMMENTED in

• South Cork Board of Public Assistance v O'Regan