Coutts v Commonwealth

Core Citations

---

DISTINGUISHES

REFERS TO

• Ridge v Baldwin

CONSIDERS

• Kaye v Attorney-General (Tasmania)
• Commonwealth v Welsh
• Marks v Commonwealth

CITES

• Ryder v Foley
• Cross v Commonwealth
• Fletcher v Nott

[See more]

• Reedman v Hoare
• R v Toohey; ex parte Northern Land Council
• Groves v Commonwealth
• Ex parte John Anderson Robertson
• Re Tufnell
• Shenton v Smith
• Gould v Stuart
• Leaman v The King
• Carey v Commonwealth
• Allpike v Commonwealth
• Commissioner for Railways (Nsw) v Scott
• Commonwealth v Quince

RELIES UPON

• Fai Insurances Ltd v Winneke

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• 157 CLR 91
• 59 ALR 699
• 59 ALJR 548

CONSIDERED in

• Truchlik v Repatriation Commission
• Barratt v Howard
• Stewart v Ronalds

[See more]

• Searle v Commonwealth of Australia
• Downe v Sydney West Area Health Service (No 2)

CITED in

• Walton v Gardiner, Herron and Gill
• Walton v Gardiner
• Martincevic v Commonwealth of Australia

APPLIED in

• Martin v Tasmania Development and Resources
• Clark v Chief of Defence Force

REFERRED in

• Md Nahar bin Noordin v Pentadbir Tanah Daerah Hulu Langat
• Minister for Arts Heritage v Peko-Wallsend Ltd

This document cites

---

• Ridge v Baldwin
• Leaman v The King
• Re Tufnell
• Gould v Stuart
• Ryder v Foley



See all quotations

• Cross v Commonwealth
• Carey v Commonwealth
• Shenton v Smith
• R v Toohey; ex parte Northern Land Council
• Groves v Commonwealth
• Fai Insurances Ltd v Winneke
• Ex parte John Anderson Robertson
• Fletcher v Nott
• Commonwealth v Quince
• Commonwealth v Welsh
• Allpike v Commonwealth
• Kaye v Attorney-General (Tasmania)
• Commissioner for Railways (Nsw) v Scott
• Reedman v Hoare
• Marks v Commonwealth