Coppinger v Sheehan

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• Duke of Buccleuch & Queensberry, K.G., v The Metropolitan Board of Works (Appeal upon a Case Stated)

CITES

• Metropolitan Board of Works v McCarthy
• McCartney v Londonderry and Lough Swilly Railway Company
• W. H. Chaplin & Company Ltd v Westminster Corporation

[See more]

• Brinckman v Matley
• North Shore Railway Company v Pion
• Mellor v Walmesley
• Hindson v Ashby

FOLLOWS

• Attorney General of the Straits Settlement v Wemyss

REFERRED in

• Kwong Hock Cheong Sawmill & Company Ltd; Yim Yip Kae and Another

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1906] 1 IR 519

This document cites

• Duke of Buccleuch & Queensberry, K.G., v The Metropolitan Board of Works (Appeal upon a Case Stated)
• Brinckman v Matley
• W. H. Chaplin & Company Ltd v Westminster Corporation
• Mellor v Walmesley
• Lyon v Fishmongers' Company



See all quotations

• Hindson v Ashby
• Attorney General of the Straits Settlement v Wemyss
• North Shore Railway Company v Pion
• Metropolitan Board of Works v McCarthy
• McCartney v Londonderry and Lough Swilly Railway Company
• Hindson v Ashby