Cooper v Healy

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• Workmen's Compensation Act 1906 - Articles : S-1
• Mitchinson v Day Brothers
• Trim Joint District School Board of Management v Kelly

REFERS TO

• Robert Anderson, Appellant; Blayney R T. Balfour, Respondent
• Nisbet v Rayne & Burn
• Craske v Wigan

[See more]

• Plumb (Pauper) v Cobden Flour Mills Company, Ltd
• Andrew v Failsworth Industrial Society
• Falconer v London and Glasgow Engineering and Iron Shipbuilding Company, Ltd
• Rowland v Wright
• Warner v Couchman
• Pierce v Provident Clothing and Supply Company
• M'Neice v Singer Sewing Machine Company, Ltd
• Guthrie v Kinghorn
• Martin v Lovibond (J.) & Sons
• Jibb v Chadwick

APPLIES

• Kate M. Collins v Daniel Collins

FOLLOWS

• Challis v London and South Western Railway Company

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1916] 2 IR 33

FOLLOWED in

• Heffernan, Applicant; The Secretary of State for The War Department, Respondent

This document cites

• M'Neice v Singer Sewing Machine Company, Ltd
• Andrew v Failsworth Industrial Society
• Jibb v Chadwick
• Pierce v Provident Clothing and Supply Company
• Nisbet v Rayne & Burn



See all quotations

• Rowland v Wright
• Challis v London and South Western Railway Company
• Warner v Couchman
• Craske v Wigan
• Plumb (Pauper) v Cobden Flour Mills Company, Ltd
• Risdale v Kilmarnock (Owners of S.S.)
• Falconer v London and Glasgow Engineering and Iron Shipbuilding Company, Ltd
• Trim Joint District School Board of Management v Kelly
• Mitchinson v Day Brothers
• Martin v Lovibond (J.) & Sons
• Guthrie v Kinghorn
• Workmen's Compensation Act 1906
• Workmen's Compensation Act 1897
• Greene, Applicant; Shaw, Respondent
• Kate M. Collins v Daniel Collins
• Robert Anderson, Appellant; Blayney R T. Balfour, Respondent