Cooper Creek Cedar Ltd v Ogden,

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• Norwich Pharmacal Company v Commissioners of Customs and Excise

CONSIDERED in

• Prandi v Salisbury,
• Prandi v Salisbury,
• Prandi v Mamdani,

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• 2023 BCSC 465,

This document cites

• Equustek Solutions Inc. et al. v. Jack et al., [2014] B.C.T.C. Uned. 454
• Bergmanis et al. v. Diamond et al., [2012] O.T.C. Uned. 5762
• 0856464 B.C. v. TimberWest Forest, [2012] B.C.T.C. Uned. 597
• Olsen et al. v. Facebook Inc., 2016 NSSC 155
• Pepsi-Cola Canada Beverages (West) Ltd. v. Retail, Wholesale and Department Store Union Local 558 et al., (2002) 280 N.R. 333 (SCC)



See all quotations

• GEA Group AG v. Ventra Group Co. et al., 2009 ONCA 878
• Procon Mining & Tunnelling Ltd. et al. v. McNeil et al., 2007 BCSC 454
• Alberta (Treasury Branches) v. Leahy et al., (2002) 303 A.R. 63 (CA)
• Alberta Treasury Branches v. Leahy,
• Morasse v. Nadeau‑Dubois, 2016 SCC 44
• HOUSEMAN v. RATEMD’S INC., 2017 SKQB 321
• Vancouver Aquarium Marine Science Centre v. Charbonneau, 2017 BCCA 395
• Norwich Pharmacal Company v Commissioners of Customs and Excise
• Commission Regulation (EC) No 168/2009 of 3 March 2009 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables
• Cooper Creek Cedar Ltd. v. Ogden,