The convenience of the employer test: why we should reconsider the critique of New York's tax apportionment scheme.

This document cites

• Bosworth v Farrand
• Commissioners of Inland Revenue v Harton Coal Company Ltd
• New York - Fass v. State Tax Commission
• New York - Billson v. State, 59097
• Federal Cases - Michigan v. Long, 82-256



See all quotations

• Federal Cases - Moorman Manufacturing Company v. Bair
• Federal Cases - Goldberg v. Sweet Gte Sprint Communications Corporation v. Sweet
• New York - Morehouse v. Murphy
• New York - Huckaby v. New York State Div.
• New York - Linsley v. Gallman
• New York - Gross v. State Tax Commission
• New York - Speno v. Gallman
• New York - Burke v. Bragalini
• New York - Jones v. Berman
• New York - Kitman v. State Tax Com'n
• New York - Colleary v. Tully
• Federal Cases - Complete Auto Transit, Inc v. Brady
• New York - Oxnard v. Murphy
• New York - Feinberg's Estate, In re
• New York - Motor Vehicle Acc. Indemnification Corp. v. Continental Nat. Am. Group Co.
• Federal Cases - Huckaby v. New York State Division of Tax Appeals
• New York - Zelinsky v. Tax Appeals Trib.
• Federal Cases - Maxwell v. Bugbee Hill v. Same
• Federal Cases - Nordlinger v. Hahn
• Federal Cases - Quill Corporation v. North Dakota Heitkamp
• Federal Cases - Zelinsky v. Tax Appeals Tribunal of New York
• Federal Cases - Oklahoma Tax Comm'n v. Jefferson Lines Inc.
• Federal Cases - Shaffer v. Carter
• New York - Fischer v. State Tax Com'n
• Federal Cases - State of Wisconsin v. Penney Co