Contract + tort = property: the trade secret illustration.

This document cites

• Federal Cases - 699 F.Supp. 1009 (D.Mass. 1988), Civ. A. 87-0858, SAPC, Inc. v. Lotus Development Corp.
• Federal Cases - 442 F.2d 216 (2nd Cir. 1971), 425, Painton & Company v. Bourns, Inc.
• Federal Cases - 71 F.3d 464 (2nd Cir. 1995), 1858, Lipton v. Nature Co.
• Federal Cases - 216 F. 401 (W.D.Mich. 1908), 1577, Hamilton Mfg. Co. v. Tubbs Mfg. Co.
• Federal Cases - 431 F.2d 1012 (5th Cir. 1970), 28254, E. I. duPont deNemours & Co. v. Christopher



See all quotations

• Federal Cases - 3 F.3d 1057 (7th Cir. 1993), 92-1668, United States v. Cheek
• Federal Cases - 381 F.3d 811 (8th Cir. 2004), 03-1443, Conseco Finance Servicing Corp. v. North American Mortgage Co.
• Federal Cases - 334 F.Supp.2d 1058 (N.D.Ill. 2004), 03 C 8618, DIRECTV, Inc. v. Ostrowski
• Federal Cases - 681 F.Supp.2d 985 (W.D.Wis. 2010), 09-cv-494-vis, Friemuth v. Fiskars Brands, Inc.
• Federal Cases - 343 F.Supp.2d 762 (N.D.Iowa 2004), C 04-4034, Oldcastle Materials, Inc. v. Rohlin
• Federal Cases - 510 F.Supp.2d 1063 (S.D.Fla. 2007), 04-14360, Stuart Cay Marina v. M/V Special Delivery
• Federal Cases - 62 F.3d 1512 (Fed. Cir. 1995), 93-1088, Hilton Davis Chemical Co. v. Warner-Jenkinson Co., Inc.
• Federal Cases - 80 F.3d 1566 (Fed. Cir. 1996), 94-1498, Jurgens v. CBK, Ltd.
• Federal Cases - 466 U.S. 170 (1984), 82-15, Oliver v. United States
• Federal Cases - 467 U.S. 986 (1984), 83-196, Ruckelshaus v. Monsanto Co.
• Federal Cases - 480 U.S. 102 (1987), 85-693, Asahi Metal Indus. Co., Ltd. v. Superior Ct. of California
• Federal Cases - 517 U.S. 559 (1996), 94-896, BMW of North America, Inc. v. Gore
• Federal Cases - 520 U.S. 17 (1997), 95-728, Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co.
• Alabama - 518 So.2d 130 (Ala.Civ.App. 1987), Civ. 6008, Mason v. Jack Daniel Distillery
• Arkansas - 40 S.W.3d 805 (Ark.App. 2001), CA 00-681, City Slickers, Inc. v. Douglas
• Federal Cases - 320 B.R. 772 (Bkrtcy.S.D.N.Y. 2005), 02-13533, In re WorldCom, Inc.
• California - 48 Cal. 165, 3,004, In re Estate of Miller
• California - 32 Cal.4th 1029, S102251, State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co. v. Garamendi
• Florida - 30 So.2d 744 (Fla. 1947), State v. Bacom
• Colorado - 23 P.3d 1287 (Colo.App. 2001), 00CA0886, Sonoco Products v. Johnson Jr.
• Georgia - 209 S.E.2d 188 (Ga. 1974), 28849, Baranan v. Fulton County
• Iowa - 753 N.W.2d 1 (Iowa 2008), 03-1869, Cemen Tech, Inc. v. Three D Industries, L.L.C.
• Illinois - 97 N.E. 280 (Ill. 1911), Board of Highway Com'rs, Bloomington Tp., v. City of Bloomington
• Illinois - 483 N.E.2d 1258 (Ill. 1985), 60872, In re Thebus
• Indiana - 825 N.E.2d 397 (Ind.App. 2005), 64A05-0409-CV-486, Coleman v. Vukovich
• Illinois - 620 N.E.2d 668 (Ill.App. 5 Dist. 1993), 5-92-0096, Hall v. Dumitru
• Louisiana - 157 So.2d 911 (La.App. 3 Cir. 1963), 946, Sonnier v. United States Cas. Co.
• Michigan - 619 N.W.2d 725 (Mich.App. 2000), 210896, Plymouth Canton Community Crier, Inc. v. Prose
• New Jersey - 25 A. 926 (N.J.L. 1893), Dimock v. The United States National Bank
• New Jersey - 268 A.2d 548 (N.J.Super.Ch. 1970), Bayer v. Airlift Intern., Inc.