Contentious business: merchants and the creation of a westernized judiciary in Hawai'i.

This document cites

• Federal Cases - 753 F.2d 1468 (9th Cir. 1985), 78-2264, Robinson v. Ariyoshi
• Federal Cases - 875 F.Supp. 680 (D.Hawai'i 1995), CV. 94-00094, Pai'Ohana v. United States
• Hawaii - 1 Haw. 143 (Hawai'i 1854), The King v. Aiko
• Hawaii - 1 Haw. 31 (Haw.Super. 1848), Martin v. Montgomery
• Hawaii - 1 Haw. 44 (Haw.Super. 1851), Hubertson v. Cole



See all quotations

• Hawaii - 1 Haw. 50 (Haw.Super. 1851), Apong v. Marks
• Hawaii - 2 Haw. 715 (Hawai'i 1864), In re Estate of Kamehameha IV
• Hawaii - 504 P.2d 1330 (Hawai'i 1973), 4879, McBryde Sugar Co., Ltd. v. Robinson
• Hawaii - 566 P.2d 725 (Hawai'i 1977), 5522, State by Kobayashi v. Zimring
• Hawaii - 656 P.2d 57 (Hawai'i 1982), 7738, Reppun v. Board of Water Supply
• Hawaii - 656 P.2d 745 (Hawai'i 1982), 6957, Kalipi v. Hawaiian Trust Co., Ltd.
• Hawaii - 837 P.2d 1247 (Hawai'i 1992), 15373, Pele Defense Fund v. Paty
• Hawaii - 903 P.2d 1246 (Hawai'i 1995), 15460, Public Access Shoreline Hawaii by Rothstein v. Hawai'i County Planning Com'n by Fujimoto