Constitutional law - Ninth Circuit characterizes taser as 'intermediate' level of force requiring justification of strong governmental interest.

This document cites

• Federal Cases - 481 F.2d 1028 (2nd Cir. 1973), 845, Johnson v. Glick
• Federal Cases - 892 F.2d 489 (6th Cir. 1989), 89-5132, Collins v. Nagle
• Federal Cases - 369 F.3d 1270 (11th Cir. 2004), 03-14745, Draper v. Reynolds
• Federal Cases - 574 F.3d 491 (8th Cir. 2009), 08-1640, Brown v. City of Golden Valley
• Federal Cases - 112 F.3d 416 (9th Cir. 1997), 95-56162, Forrett v. Richardson



See all quotations

• Federal Cases - 240 F.3d 1185 (9th Cir. 2000), 98-17250, Head Waters Forest Defense v. The County of Humbolt
• Federal Cases - 27 F.3d 1432 (9th Cir. 1994), 91-55718, Chew v. Gates
• Federal Cases - 272 F.3d 1272 (9th Cir. 2001), 99-17188, Deorle v Rutherford
• Federal Cases - 630 F.3d 805 (9th Cir. 2010), 08-55622, Bryan v. MacPherson
• Federal Cases - 509 F.3d 1278 (10th Cir. 2007), 06-1426, Casey v. City of Federal Heights
• Federal Cases - 471 U.S. 1 (1985), 83-1035, Tennessee v. Garner
• Federal Cases - 472 U.S. 511 (1985), 84-335, Mitchell v. Forsyth
• Federal Cases - 490 U.S. 386 (1989), 87-6571, Graham v. Connor
• Federal Cases - 533 U.S. 194 (2001), 99-1977, Saucier v. Katz
• Federal Cases - 555 U.S. 223 (2009), 07-751, Pearson v. Callahan
• Federal Cases - 365 U.S. 167 (1961), 39, Monroe v. Pape
• Federal Cases - 392 U.S. 1 (1968), 67, Terry v. Ohio