Council of the European Union v Hamas.

Core Citations

WORK EXPRESSION OF

• Council of the European Union v Hamas.

This document cites

• Yassin Abdullah Kadi and Al Barakaat International Foundation v Council of the European Union and Commission of the European Communities.
• Saint-Gobain Glass Deutschland GmbH v Commission of the European Communities.
• Islamic Republic of Iran Shipping Lines and Others v Council of the European Union.
• Commission of the European Communities v BASF AG, Limburgse Vinyl Maatschappij NV, DSM NV, DSM Kunststoffen BV, Hüls AG, Elf Atochem SA, Société Artésienne de Vinyle SA, Wacker Chemie GmbH, Enichem SpA, Hoechst AG, Imperial Chemical Industries plc, Shell International Chemical Company Ltd and Montedison SpA.
• Laurent Gbagbo (C-478/11 P), Katinan Justin Koné (C-479/11 P), Akissi Danièle Boni-Claverie (C-480/11 P), Alcide Djédjé (C-481/11 P) and Affi Pascal N’Guessan (C-482/11 P) v Council of the European Union.



See all quotations

• British Airways plc v European Commission.
• Comisión de las Comunidades Europeas contra Imperial Chemical Industries plc (ICI).
• Council Common Position of 27 December 2001 on the application of specific measures to combat terrorism
• 2001/927/EC: Council Decision of 27 December 2001 establishing the list provided for in Article 2(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 on specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities with a view to combating terrorism
• Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice
• Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union 2016/C 202/01
• Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/1071 of 30 July 2018 implementing Article 2(3) of Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 on specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities with a view to combating terrorism and repealing Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/468
• Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1420 of 4 August 2017 implementing Article 2(3) of Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 on specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities with a view to combating terrorism, and repealing Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/150
• Council Decision (CFSP) 2017/1426 of 4 August 2017 updating the list of persons, groups and entities subject to Articles 2, 3 and 4 of Common Position 2001/931/CFSP on the application of specific measures to combat terrorism, and repealing Decision (CFSP) 2017/154
• Council Decision (CFSP) 2018/1084 of 30 July 2018 updating the list of persons, groups and entities subject to Articles 2, 3 and 4 of Common Position 2001/931/CFSP on the application of specific measures to combat terrorism, and repealing Decision (CFSP) 2018/475
• Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/468 of 21 March 2018 implementing Article 2(3) of Reglation (EC) No 2580/2001 on specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities with a view to combating terrorism and repealing Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1420
• Council Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 of 27 December 2001 on specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities with a view to combating terrorism
• Council Decision (CFSP) 2018/475 of 21 March 2018 updating the list of persons, groups and entities subject to Articles 2, 3 and 4 of Common Position 2001/931/CFSP on the application of specific measures to combat terrorism, and repealing Decision (CFSP) 2017/1426
• Arrêt de la Cour (septième chambre) du 10 septembre 2020.#Hamas contre Conseil de l'Union européenne.#Pourvoi – Politique étrangère et de sécurité commune Lutte contre le terrorisme – Mesures restrictives prises à l’encontre de certaines personnes et entités – Gel des fonds – Position commune 2001/931/PESC – Article 1er, paragraphes 4 et 6 – Règlement (CE) n° 2580/2001 – Article 2, paragraphe 3 – Maintien d’une organisation sur la liste des personnes, des groupes et des entités impliqués dans des actes de terrorisme – Conditions – Autorité compétente équivalente à une autorité judiciaire – Décision de condamnation – Persistance du risque d’implication dans des activités terroristes Base factuelle des décisions de gel des fonds – Obligation de motivation – Droit à une protection juridictionnelle effective.#Affaire C-122/19 P.
• Treaty establishing the European Community
• European Commission v Fútbol Club Barcelona.