Conolly v Rankine
Linked as:
Extract
Conolly v Rankine
No longer available (Autolink)
See the full content of this document
Core Citations
DISTINGUISHES
CONSIDERED in
- Between: (1) Cayman Islands Shores Development Ltd (2) Palm Sunshine Appellants (Plaintiffs below) v (1) Registrar of Lands (2) The Proprietors, Strata Plan No 79 (known as Lion's Court) (3) The Proprietors, Strata Plan No 147 (known as Regent's Court) (4) The Proprietors, Strata Plan No. 215 (known as King's Court) (5) The Britannia Proprietors (being the persons whose names and addresses are set out in Section B of Schedule 1 and the Re-Amended Originating Summons) Respondents (Defendants below)
- Cayman Shores Development Ltd v The Registrar of Lands
- Between: (1) Cayman Islands Shores Development Ltd (2) Palm Sunshine Appellants (Plaintiffs below) v (1) Registrar of Lands (2) The Proprietors, Strata Plan No 79 (known as Lion's Court) (3) The Proprietors, Strata Plan No 147 (known as Regent's Court) (4) The Proprietors, Strata Plan No. 215 (known as King's Court) (5) The Britannia Proprietors (being the persons whose names and addresses are set out in Section B of Schedule 1 and the Re-Amended Originating Summons) Respondents (Defendants below)
REPORTED OPINION OF in